IRBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Casey's General Stores has a net margin of -44.82% compared to iRobot's net margin of 2.23%. iRobot's return on equity of -95.61% beat Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85%.

iRobot has a consensus price target of $11.94, signalling upside risk potential of 368.24%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores has an analysts' consensus of $449.89 which suggests that it could grow by 0.27%. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

iRobot has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.698, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.181%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casey's General Stores offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores pays out 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $172M, which are smaller than Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues of $3.9B. iRobot's net income of -$77.1M is lower than Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casey's General Stores's PE ratio is 31.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.12x versus 1.08x for Casey's General Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fossil Group has a net margin of -44.82% compared to iRobot's net margin of -2.21%. iRobot's return on equity of -95.61% beat Fossil Group's return on equity of -53.25%.

iRobot has a consensus price target of $11.94, signalling upside risk potential of 368.24%. On the other hand Fossil Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 90.84%. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Fossil Group, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Fossil Group.

iRobot has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fossil Group has a beta of 2.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.089%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fossil Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fossil Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $172M, which are smaller than Fossil Group quarterly revenues of $342.3M. iRobot's net income of -$77.1M is lower than Fossil Group's net income of -$7.6M. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fossil Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.12x versus 0.06x for Fossil Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of -44.82% compared to iRobot's net margin of 10.62%. iRobot's return on equity of -95.61% beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

iRobot has a consensus price target of $11.94, signalling upside risk potential of 368.24%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $272.32 which suggests that it could grow by 5.56%. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Marriott International, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Marriott International.

iRobot has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.664%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marriott International offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 28.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $172M, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.3B. iRobot's net income of -$77.1M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $665M. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marriott International's PE ratio is 29.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.12x versus 2.87x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vera Bradley has a net margin of -44.82% compared to iRobot's net margin of -46.99%. iRobot's return on equity of -95.61% beat Vera Bradley's return on equity of -26.98%.

iRobot has a consensus price target of $11.94, signalling upside risk potential of 368.24%. On the other hand Vera Bradley has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 113.9%. Given that iRobot has higher upside potential than Vera Bradley, analysts believe iRobot is more attractive than Vera Bradley.

iRobot has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.758, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.811%.

iRobot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vera Bradley offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iRobot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vera Bradley pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iRobot quarterly revenues are $172M, which are larger than Vera Bradley quarterly revenues of $100M. iRobot's net income of -$77.1M is lower than Vera Bradley's net income of -$47M. Notably, iRobot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vera Bradley's PE ratio is 194.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iRobot is 0.12x versus 0.15x for Vera Bradley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.