HLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 1.3%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 29.09% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $153.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.55%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.74%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Hamilton Lane, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Hamilton Lane.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.314, which suggesting that the stock is 31.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.088%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Hamilton Lane's net income of $53M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.02x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.73x versus 1.16x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

B. Riley Financial has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of -14.33%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 29.09% beat B. Riley Financial's return on equity of -37.71%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $153.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.55%. On the other hand B. Riley Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 963.83%. Given that B. Riley Financial has higher upside potential than Hamilton Lane, analysts believe B. Riley Financial is more attractive than Hamilton Lane.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.314, which suggesting that the stock is 31.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison B. Riley Financial has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.963%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. B. Riley Financial offers a yield of 106.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. B. Riley Financial pays out -149.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than B. Riley Financial quarterly revenues of $343M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $53M is higher than B. Riley Financial's net income of -$49.2M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.02x while B. Riley Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.73x versus 0.06x for B. Riley Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 27.48%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 29.09% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $153.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.55%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $85.20 which suggests that it could grow by 4.75%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Hamilton Lane, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Hamilton Lane.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.314, which suggesting that the stock is 31.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.563%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. Hamilton Lane's net income of $53M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.02x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 17.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.73x versus 4.92x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 31.48% compared to Hamilton Lane's net margin of 27.81%. Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 29.09% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $153.67, signalling downside risk potential of -5.55%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.37%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than Hamilton Lane, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than Hamilton Lane.

Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.314, which suggesting that the stock is 31.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.500, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.998%.

Hamilton Lane has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Hamilton Lane pays 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues are $168.3M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Hamilton Lane's net income of $53M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Hamilton Lane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.02x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hamilton Lane is 12.73x versus 2.91x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.