GWRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Water Works has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 19.9%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 12.04% beat American Water Works's return on equity of 10.38%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand American Water Works has an analysts' consensus of $139.59 which suggests that it could fall by -4.96%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than American Water Works, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than American Water Works.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Water Works has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.307%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. American Water Works offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. American Water Works pays out 55.66% of its earnings as a dividend. American Water Works's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than American Water Works quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Global Water Resources's net income of $443K is lower than American Water Works's net income of $239M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.38x while American Water Works's PE ratio is 27.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.80x versus 6.11x for American Water Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American States Water has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 19.87%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 12.04% beat American States Water's return on equity of 14.17%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand American States Water has an analysts' consensus of $80.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.23%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than American States Water, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than American States Water.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American States Water has a beta of 0.564, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.597%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. American States Water offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water pays out 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than American States Water quarterly revenues of $143.1M. Global Water Resources's net income of $443K is lower than American States Water's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.38x while American States Water's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.80x versus 5.03x for American States Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadiz has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of -210.7%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 12.04% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -84.84%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 472.52%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Global Water Resources, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Global Water Resources.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 1.539, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.906%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Global Water Resources's net income of $443K is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.38x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.80x versus 18.77x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Essential Utilities has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Global Water Resources's net margin of 30.57%. Global Water Resources's return on equity of 12.04% beat Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75%.

Global Water Resources has a consensus price target of $16.50, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand Essential Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.75%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.156% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.021%.

Global Water Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Essential Utilities offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Global Water Resources pays 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Utilities pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Utilities's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Global Water Resources quarterly revenues are $13.3M, which are smaller than Essential Utilities quarterly revenues of $604.4M. Global Water Resources's net income of $443K is lower than Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M. Notably, Global Water Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.38x while Essential Utilities's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources is 4.80x versus 5.25x for Essential Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.