GWRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz, Inc. has a net margin of 11.06% compared to Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -170.45%. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.42% beat Cadiz, Inc.'s return on equity of -101.92%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.53, signalling upside risk potential of 46.59%. On the other hand Cadiz, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.77%. Given that Cadiz, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Water Resources, Inc., analysts believe Cadiz, Inc. is more attractive than Global Water Resources, Inc..

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz, Inc. has a beta of 2.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.025%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Cadiz, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources, Inc. pays 126.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz, Inc. pays out 16.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Global Water Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Cadiz, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net income of $1.7M is higher than Cadiz, Inc.'s net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Global Water Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.29x while Cadiz, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources, Inc. is 4.00x versus 28.07x for Cadiz, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California Water Service Group has a net margin of 11.06% compared to Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 19.64%. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.42% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.53, signalling upside risk potential of 46.59%. On the other hand California Water Service Group has an analysts' consensus of $55.25 which suggests that it could grow by 22.43%. Given that Global Water Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than California Water Service Group, analysts believe Global Water Resources, Inc. is more attractive than California Water Service Group.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.993%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. California Water Service Group offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Global Water Resources, Inc. pays 126.45% of its earnings as a dividend. California Water Service Group pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. California Water Service Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Global Water Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than California Water Service Group quarterly revenues of $311.2M. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net income of $1.7M is lower than California Water Service Group's net income of $61.1M. Notably, Global Water Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.29x while California Water Service Group's PE ratio is 18.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources, Inc. is 4.00x versus 2.57x for California Water Service Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water Co. has a net margin of 11.06% compared to Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 25.81%. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.42% beat Middlesex Water Co.'s return on equity of 9.42%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.53, signalling upside risk potential of 46.59%. On the other hand Middlesex Water Co. has an analysts' consensus of $59.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.37%. Given that Global Water Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Middlesex Water Co., analysts believe Global Water Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Middlesex Water Co..

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water Co. has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.389%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Middlesex Water Co. offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Global Water Resources, Inc. pays 126.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water Co. pays out 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Global Water Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water Co. quarterly revenues of $54.1M. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net income of $1.7M is lower than Middlesex Water Co.'s net income of $14M. Notably, Global Water Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.29x while Middlesex Water Co.'s PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources, Inc. is 4.00x versus 4.78x for Middlesex Water Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Cycle Corp. has a net margin of 11.06% compared to Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 54.54%. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.42% beat Pure Cycle Corp.'s return on equity of 9.68%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.53, signalling upside risk potential of 46.59%. On the other hand Pure Cycle Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.67%. Given that Global Water Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle Corp., analysts believe Global Water Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Pure Cycle Corp..

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Cycle Corp. has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.726%.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.56%. Pure Cycle Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Water Resources, Inc. pays 126.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Cycle Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Water Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Pure Cycle Corp. quarterly revenues of $11.2M. Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net income of $1.7M is lower than Pure Cycle Corp.'s net income of $6.1M. Notably, Global Water Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.29x while Pure Cycle Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Water Resources, Inc. is 4.00x versus 10.22x for Pure Cycle Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.