GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has a net margin of -4.26% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 27.45%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -16.82% beat Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc's return on equity of 23.66%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.7%. On the other hand Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 38.79%. Given that Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has higher upside potential than Ferroglobe PLC, analysts believe Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc is more attractive than Ferroglobe PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.43%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc pays out 60.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $311.7M, which are larger than Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc quarterly revenues of $68M. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc's PE ratio is 11.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.67x versus 2.46x for Caledonia Mining Corp. Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -4.26% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -16.82% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.7%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 39.34%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Ferroglobe PLC, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Ferroglobe PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.562%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $311.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.67x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a net margin of -4.26% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 2.47%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -16.82% beat Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.7%. On the other hand Worthington Steel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.04%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Worthington Steel, Inc..

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Worthington Steel, Inc. offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays out 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $311.7M, which are smaller than Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $871.9M. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Worthington Steel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.67x versus 0.56x for Worthington Steel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -4.26% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -16.82% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.7%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 115.21%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Ferroglobe PLC, analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Ferroglobe PLC.

Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.079, which suggesting that the stock is 7.907% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.124%.

Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $311.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.67x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.