Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
43
GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.92
Seasonality move
:
-1.65%
Day range:
$4.83 - $5.07
52-week range:
$2.97 - $5.74
Dividend yield:
1.11%
P/E ratio:
187.00x
P/S ratio:
0.71x
P/B ratio:
1.19x
Volume:
1.5M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
38.57%
Market cap:
$938.7M
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.91
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$293.6M | -$0.07 | 12.17% | -87.34% | $6.00 |
|
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.
|
$4.6B | -$0.62 | 4.06% | -62.5% | $13.41 |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTTRF
Forterra Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WS
Worthington Steel, Inc.
|
$801.8M | $0.39 | 28.45% | 65.11% | $47.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$5.03 | $6.00 | $938.7M | 187.00x | $0.01 | 1.11% | 0.71x |
|
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.
|
$10.65 | $13.41 | $6.1B | 175.97x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.29x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research Plc
|
$0.04 | -- | $18.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.99x |
|
FTTRF
Forterra Plc
|
$2.1201 | -- | $447.2M | 25.08x | $0.03 | 2.5% | 0.92x |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock Plc
|
$1.70 | -- | $671M | 42.82x | $0.02 | 3.13% | 1.36x |
|
WS
Worthington Steel, Inc.
|
$44.07 | $47.00 | $2.2B | 17.84x | $0.16 | 1.45% | 0.68x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
25.4% | 0.495 | 27.22% | 0.74x |
|
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.
|
56.48% | 1.697 | 102.1% | 0.45x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research Plc
|
-- | 0.723 | -- | 3.53x |
|
FTTRF
Forterra Plc
|
26.91% | 0.184 | -- | 0.79x |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock Plc
|
29.95% | -2.773 | -- | 0.49x |
|
WS
Worthington Steel, Inc.
|
19.97% | 0.918 | 15.05% | 0.90x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
-$23.9M | -$83.2M | -17.86% | -22.67% | -25.27% | -$20.4M |
|
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.
|
-$191M | -$322M | -10.05% | -22.55% | -7.47% | -$153M |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research Plc
|
-- | -- | -14.46% | -14.46% | -- | -- |
|
FTTRF
Forterra Plc
|
-- | -- | 4.9% | 7.05% | -- | -- |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock Plc
|
-- | -- | 2.26% | 3.11% | -- | -- |
|
WS
Worthington Steel, Inc.
|
$90.1M | $19.2M | 8.88% | 10.64% | 2.2% | $74.6M |
Ferroglobe PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or CLF?
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a net margin of -26.11% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of -5.4%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -22.67% beat Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC-7.26% -$0.43 $928M CLFCleveland-Cliffs, Inc.-4.43% -$0.44 $14.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or CLF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.41 which suggests that it could grow by 25.93%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ferroglobe PLC, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Ferroglobe PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 CLFCleveland-Cliffs, Inc.2 8 0 -
Is GSM or CLF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.925%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or CLF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or CLF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $329.4M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$86M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.71x versus 0.29x for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.71x 187.00x $329.4M -$86M CLFCleveland-Cliffs, Inc.0.29x 175.97x $4.3B -$233M
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or EDNSF?
Eden Research Plc has a net margin of -26.11% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -22.67% beat Eden Research Plc's return on equity of -14.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC-7.26% -$0.43 $928M EDNSFEden Research Plc-- -- $16.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Eden Research Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Eden Research Plc, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Eden Research Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 EDNSFEden Research Plc0 0 0 -
Is GSM or EDNSF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eden Research Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Eden Research Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Eden Research Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $329.4M, which are larger than Eden Research Plc quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$86M is higher than Eden Research Plc's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Eden Research Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.71x versus 3.99x for Eden Research Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.71x 187.00x $329.4M -$86M EDNSFEden Research Plc3.99x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or FTTRF?
Forterra Plc has a net margin of -26.11% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -22.67% beat Forterra Plc's return on equity of 7.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC-7.26% -$0.43 $928M FTTRFForterra Plc-- -- $430.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Forterra Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Forterra Plc, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Forterra Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 FTTRFForterra Plc0 0 0 -
Is GSM or FTTRF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forterra Plc has a beta of 1,783.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 178199.995%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Forterra Plc offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Forterra Plc pays out 36.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $329.4M, which are larger than Forterra Plc quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$86M is higher than Forterra Plc's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Forterra Plc's PE ratio is 25.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.71x versus 0.92x for Forterra Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.71x 187.00x $329.4M -$86M FTTRFForterra Plc0.92x 25.08x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or IBJHF?
Ibstock Plc has a net margin of -26.11% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -22.67% beat Ibstock Plc's return on equity of 3.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC-7.26% -$0.43 $928M IBJHFIbstock Plc-- -- $765.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Ibstock Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Ibstock Plc, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Ibstock Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 IBJHFIbstock Plc0 0 0 -
Is GSM or IBJHF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibstock Plc has a beta of -0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.164%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Ibstock Plc offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Ibstock Plc pays out 104.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ibstock Plc's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $329.4M, which are larger than Ibstock Plc quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$86M is higher than Ibstock Plc's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Ibstock Plc's PE ratio is 42.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.71x versus 1.36x for Ibstock Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.71x 187.00x $329.4M -$86M IBJHFIbstock Plc1.36x 42.82x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or WS?
Worthington Steel, Inc. has a net margin of -26.11% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 2.47%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -22.67% beat Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC-7.26% -$0.43 $928M WSWorthington Steel, Inc.10.33% $0.37 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or WS?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Worthington Steel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.65%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Worthington Steel, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 WSWorthington Steel, Inc.1 1 0 -
Is GSM or WS More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or WS?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Worthington Steel, Inc. offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays out 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or WS?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $329.4M, which are smaller than Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $871.9M. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$86M is lower than Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 187.00x while Worthington Steel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.71x versus 0.68x for Worthington Steel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.71x 187.00x $329.4M -$86M WSWorthington Steel, Inc.0.68x 17.84x $871.9M $21.5M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 23
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is down 12.48% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 23
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 7.95% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 23
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is down 2.63% over the past day.
