GODN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Star Acquisition's net margin of 16.32%. Golden Star Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 16.97%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Golden Star Acquisition, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Golden Star Acquisition.

Golden Star Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Golden Star Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golden Star Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Golden Star Acquisition's net income of $248.1K is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Golden Star Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Star Acquisition is -- versus 2.83x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Marygold Companies has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Star Acquisition's net margin of -20.05%. Golden Star Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat The Marygold Companies's return on equity of -18.49%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Marygold Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Star Acquisition has higher upside potential than The Marygold Companies, analysts believe Golden Star Acquisition is more attractive than The Marygold Companies.

Golden Star Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Marygold Companies has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.964%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Marygold Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Star Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Marygold Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Star Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Marygold Companies quarterly revenues of $7.9M. Golden Star Acquisition's net income of $248.1K is higher than The Marygold Companies's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Golden Star Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Marygold Companies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Star Acquisition is -- versus 2.17x for The Marygold Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Star Acquisition's net margin of 27.77%. Golden Star Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Golden Star Acquisition, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Golden Star Acquisition.

Golden Star Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Golden Star Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golden Star Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Golden Star Acquisition's net income of $248.1K is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Golden Star Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park National's PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Star Acquisition is -- versus 5.63x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of -- compared to Golden Star Acquisition's net margin of 24.66%. Golden Star Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.77%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Golden Star Acquisition, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Golden Star Acquisition.

Golden Star Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

Golden Star Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Golden Star Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Star Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Golden Star Acquisition's net income of $248.1K is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Golden Star Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Star Acquisition is -- versus 3.31x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.