GLAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Highest Performances Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Global Lights Acquisition's net margin of --. Global Lights Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Highest Performances Holdings's return on equity of -14.5%.

Global Lights Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highest Performances Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Lights Acquisition has higher upside potential than Highest Performances Holdings, analysts believe Global Lights Acquisition is more attractive than Highest Performances Holdings.

Global Lights Acquisition has a beta of 0.087, which suggesting that the stock is 91.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highest Performances Holdings has a beta of -0.289, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.932%.

Global Lights Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highest Performances Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Lights Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highest Performances Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Lights Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highest Performances Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Global Lights Acquisition's net income of $783.8K is higher than Highest Performances Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Global Lights Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.53x while Highest Performances Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Lights Acquisition is -- versus 0.40x for Highest Performances Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of -- compared to Global Lights Acquisition's net margin of --. Global Lights Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat The9's return on equity of --.

Global Lights Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Lights Acquisition has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Global Lights Acquisition is more attractive than The9.

Global Lights Acquisition has a beta of 0.087, which suggesting that the stock is 91.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.461%.

Global Lights Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Lights Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Lights Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Global Lights Acquisition's net income of $783.8K is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, Global Lights Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.53x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Lights Acquisition is -- versus 2.72x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Global Lights Acquisition's net margin of 17.57%. Global Lights Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

Global Lights Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $8.03 which suggests that it could grow by 21.12%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than Global Lights Acquisition, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than Global Lights Acquisition.

Global Lights Acquisition has a beta of 0.087, which suggesting that the stock is 91.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.894%.

Global Lights Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Lights Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Lights Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. Global Lights Acquisition's net income of $783.8K is lower than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Global Lights Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.53x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 36.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Lights Acquisition is -- versus 3.17x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.