Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
46
TIGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.84
Seasonality move
:
-5.13%
Day range:
$7.91 - $8.17
52-week range:
$6.38 - $13.55
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
9.71x
P/S ratio:
2.65x
P/B ratio:
1.84x
Volume:
1.8M
Avg. volume:
2.6M
1-year change:
4.53%
Market cap:
$1.4B
Revenue:
$391.7M
EPS (TTM):
$0.83
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
$108.2M | $0.26 | -0.28% | 42.3% | $14.57 |
|
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OVCHY
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCDVF
Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UOVEY
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YNGFF
Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
$8.08 | $14.57 | $1.4B | 9.71x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.65x |
|
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$181.66 | -- | $128.9B | 10.42x | $2.29 | 4.06% | 4.48x |
|
OVCHY
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
|
$33.80 | -- | $76B | 13.55x | $0.63 | 3.73% | 3.89x |
|
PCDVF
Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.
|
$0.34 | -- | $906.2M | -- | $0.02 | 17.87% | 481.55x |
|
UOVEY
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
|
$58.18 | -- | $48.3B | 9.91x | $1.71 | 4.62% | 2.49x |
|
YNGFF
Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.
|
$0.28 | -- | $959M | 5.23x | $0.03 | 9.35% | 4.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
17.64% | -0.645 | 9.11% | 0.62x |
|
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
|
52.67% | 0.453 | -- | 6.09x |
|
OVCHY
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
|
33.36% | -0.071 | -- | 2.96x |
|
PCDVF
Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.
|
78.83% | 1.598 | -- | 1.04x |
|
UOVEY
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
|
41.25% | 0.214 | -- | 71.89x |
|
YNGFF
Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.
|
0.58% | -2.028 | -- | 28.09x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
|
$168.1M | $85.8M | 17.76% | 22.17% | 48.94% | $153.8M |
|
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.42% | 16.72% | 59.11% | -- |
|
OVCHY
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 9.34% | 12.3% | 65.18% | -- |
|
PCDVF
Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -5.73% | -13.07% | -- | -- |
|
UOVEY
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
|
-- | -- | 6.83% | 12.18% | -- | -- |
|
YNGFF
Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 7.49% | 7.52% | -- | -- |
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TIGR or DBSDY?
DBS Group Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 49.27%. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat DBS Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.95.87% $0.29 $989M DBSDYDBS Group Holdings Ltd.-- $3.06 $113.6B -
What do Analysts Say About TIGR or DBSDY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.57, signalling upside risk potential of 80.32%. On the other hand DBS Group Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than DBS Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than DBS Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.8 0 1 DBSDYDBS Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIGR or DBSDY More Risky?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.485, which suggesting that the stock is 51.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DBS Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.964%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or DBSDY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DBS Group Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 4.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.29 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DBS Group Holdings Ltd. pays out 76.61% of its earnings as a dividend. DBS Group Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or DBSDY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are smaller than DBS Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is lower than DBS Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $2.2B. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.71x while DBS Group Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.65x versus 4.48x for DBS Group Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.2.65x 9.71x $175.4M $54M DBSDYDBS Group Holdings Ltd.4.48x 10.42x $4.4B $2.2B
-
Which has Higher Returns TIGR or OVCHY?
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 51.45%. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.95.87% $0.29 $989M OVCHYOversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.-- $0.62 $71.9B -
What do Analysts Say About TIGR or OVCHY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.57, signalling upside risk potential of 80.32%. On the other hand Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.8 0 1 OVCHYOversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIGR or OVCHY More Risky?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.485, which suggesting that the stock is 51.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.493%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or OVCHY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. pays out 47.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or OVCHY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are smaller than Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is lower than Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.71x while Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.65x versus 3.89x for Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.2.65x 9.71x $175.4M $54M OVCHYOversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.3.89x 13.55x $2.7B $1.4B
-
Which has Higher Returns TIGR or PCDVF?
Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.'s return on equity of -13.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.95.87% $0.29 $989M PCDVFPacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.-- -- $251.9M -
What do Analysts Say About TIGR or PCDVF?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.57, signalling upside risk potential of 80.32%. On the other hand Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.8 0 1 PCDVFPacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIGR or PCDVF More Risky?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.485, which suggesting that the stock is 51.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd. has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.745%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or PCDVF?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd. offers a yield of 17.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd. pays out 895.67% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or PCDVF?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are larger than Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.71x while Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.65x versus 481.55x for Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.2.65x 9.71x $175.4M $54M PCDVFPacific Century Regional Developments Ltd.481.55x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TIGR or UOVEY?
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore) has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)'s return on equity of 12.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.95.87% $0.29 $989M UOVEYUnited Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)-- -- $67.3B -
What do Analysts Say About TIGR or UOVEY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.57, signalling upside risk potential of 80.32%. On the other hand United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore), analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.8 0 1 UOVEYUnited Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)0 0 0 -
Is TIGR or UOVEY More Risky?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.485, which suggesting that the stock is 51.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore) has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.808%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or UOVEY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore) offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore) pays out 51.63% of its earnings as a dividend. United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or UOVEY?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are larger than United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore) quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)'s net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.71x while United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)'s PE ratio is 9.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.65x versus 2.49x for United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.2.65x 9.71x $175.4M $54M UOVEYUnited Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)2.49x 9.91x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TIGR or YNGFF?
Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.95.87% $0.29 $989M YNGFFYangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.-- -- $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About TIGR or YNGFF?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.57, signalling upside risk potential of 80.32%. On the other hand Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.8 0 1 YNGFFYangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIGR or YNGFF More Risky?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.485, which suggesting that the stock is 51.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or YNGFF?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 9.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd. pays out 39.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or YNGFF?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are larger than Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.71x while Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.65x versus 4.61x for Yangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIGRUP Fintech Holding Ltd.2.65x 9.71x $175.4M $54M YNGFFYangzijiang Financial Holding Ltd.4.61x 5.23x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
