Financhill
Buy
55

TIGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$9.03
Seasonality move :
12.09%
Day range:
$8.96 - $9.05
52-week range:
$5.64 - $13.55
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
10.84x
P/S ratio:
2.96x
P/B ratio:
2.06x
Volume:
562.6K
Avg. volume:
3.5M
1-year change:
22.39%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$391.7M
EPS (TTM):
$0.83

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
$108.6M $0.26 -0.28% 42.3% $14.56
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
$129.2M $0.02 10.52% -81.74% $6.95
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
RFAI
RF Acquisition Corp. II
-- -- -- -- --
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
$9.02 $14.56 $1.6B 10.84x $0.00 0% 2.96x
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
$0.19 -- $16.6M -- $0.00 0% 158.15x
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
$2.64 $6.95 $439.5M 6.93x $0.00 0% 0.93x
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
$2.84 -- $18.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.02x
RFAI
RF Acquisition Corp. II
$10.80 -- $162.1M 48.47x $0.00 0% --
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
$1.04 -- $38.6M 61.61x $0.00 0% 11.57x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
17.64% -0.673 9.11% 0.62x
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
-- 3.378 -- --
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
46.75% 1.234 31.15% 1.77x
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
8.46% 2.945 -1091.78% 1.12x
RFAI
RF Acquisition Corp. II
-- 0.004 -- 1.07x
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
-- 1.092 -- 3.64x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
$168.1M $85.8M 17.76% 22.17% 48.94% $153.8M
BTOG
Bit Origin Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --
FUFU
BitFuFu, Inc.
$7.2M $4.1M 19.32% 37.73% 2.25% -$177.9M
LGHL
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
-- -- -47.1% -50.99% -- --
RFAI
RF Acquisition Corp. II
-- -$178.9K 3.75% 3.75% -- -$53.2K
TOP
TOP Financial Group Ltd.
-- -- 2.73% 2.73% -- --

UP Fintech Holding Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns TIGR or BTOG?

    Bit Origin Ltd. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat Bit Origin Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    95.87% $0.29 $989M
    BTOG
    Bit Origin Ltd.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About TIGR or BTOG?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 61.4%. On the other hand Bit Origin Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bit Origin Ltd., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Bit Origin Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    8 0 1
    BTOG
    Bit Origin Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is TIGR or BTOG More Risky?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bit Origin Ltd. has a beta of 1.910, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.008%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or BTOG?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bit Origin Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bit Origin Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or BTOG?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are larger than Bit Origin Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than Bit Origin Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while Bit Origin Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.96x versus 158.15x for Bit Origin Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    2.96x 10.84x $175.4M $54M
    BTOG
    Bit Origin Ltd.
    158.15x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns TIGR or FUFU?

    BitFuFu, Inc. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 6.4%. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat BitFuFu, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    95.87% $0.29 $989M
    FUFU
    BitFuFu, Inc.
    3.96% $0.07 $409.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About TIGR or FUFU?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 61.4%. On the other hand BitFuFu, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.95 which suggests that it could grow by 163.41%. Given that BitFuFu, Inc. has higher upside potential than UP Fintech Holding Ltd., analysts believe BitFuFu, Inc. is more attractive than UP Fintech Holding Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    8 0 1
    FUFU
    BitFuFu, Inc.
    3 1 0
  • Is TIGR or FUFU More Risky?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitFuFu, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or FUFU?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BitFuFu, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BitFuFu, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or FUFU?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are smaller than BitFuFu, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.7M. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than BitFuFu, Inc.'s net income of $11.6M. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while BitFuFu, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.96x versus 0.93x for BitFuFu, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    2.96x 10.84x $175.4M $54M
    FUFU
    BitFuFu, Inc.
    0.93x 6.93x $180.7M $11.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns TIGR or LGHL?

    Lion Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat Lion Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -50.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    95.87% $0.29 $989M
    LGHL
    Lion Group Holding Ltd.
    -- -- $24.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About TIGR or LGHL?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 61.4%. On the other hand Lion Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lion Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Lion Group Holding Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    8 0 1
    LGHL
    Lion Group Holding Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is TIGR or LGHL More Risky?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lion Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 2.464, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.361%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or LGHL?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lion Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lion Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or LGHL?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are larger than Lion Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than Lion Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while Lion Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.96x versus 0.02x for Lion Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    2.96x 10.84x $175.4M $54M
    LGHL
    Lion Group Holding Ltd.
    0.02x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns TIGR or RFAI?

    RF Acquisition Corp. II has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat RF Acquisition Corp. II's return on equity of 3.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    95.87% $0.29 $989M
    RFAI
    RF Acquisition Corp. II
    -- $0.05 $92.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About TIGR or RFAI?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 61.4%. On the other hand RF Acquisition Corp. II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than RF Acquisition Corp. II, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than RF Acquisition Corp. II.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    8 0 1
    RFAI
    RF Acquisition Corp. II
    0 0 0
  • Is TIGR or RFAI More Risky?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Acquisition Corp. II has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or RFAI?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Acquisition Corp. II offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Acquisition Corp. II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or RFAI?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are larger than RF Acquisition Corp. II quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than RF Acquisition Corp. II's net income of $823.2K. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while RF Acquisition Corp. II's PE ratio is 48.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.96x versus -- for RF Acquisition Corp. II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    2.96x 10.84x $175.4M $54M
    RFAI
    RF Acquisition Corp. II
    -- 48.47x -- $823.2K
  • Which has Higher Returns TIGR or TOP?

    TOP Financial Group Ltd. has a net margin of 30.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.17% beat TOP Financial Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    95.87% $0.29 $989M
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group Ltd.
    -- -- $40.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About TIGR or TOP?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 61.4%. On the other hand TOP Financial Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group Ltd., analysts believe UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than TOP Financial Group Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    8 0 1
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is TIGR or TOP More Risky?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIGR or TOP?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios TIGR or TOP?

    UP Fintech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $175.4M, which are larger than TOP Financial Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s net income of $54M is higher than TOP Financial Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.84x while TOP Financial Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. is 2.96x versus 11.57x for TOP Financial Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    TIGR
    UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
    2.96x 10.84x $175.4M $54M
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group Ltd.
    11.57x 61.61x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25

Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25

Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.

Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock