GECC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of -11687.77% compared to Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net margin of --. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -24.03% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40%. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Great Elm Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Great Elm Capital Corp. is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.521% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.216, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.38%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.11%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Great Elm Capital Corp. pays 387.92% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Elm Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $188K, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net income of -$22M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Great Elm Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Capital Corp. is 1.30x versus 37.93x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PennantPark Investment Corp. has a net margin of -11687.77% compared to Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net margin of 10.38%. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -24.03% beat PennantPark Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 5.37%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40%. On the other hand PennantPark Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.6%. Given that Great Elm Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than PennantPark Investment Corp., analysts believe Great Elm Capital Corp. is more attractive than PennantPark Investment Corp..

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.521% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennantPark Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.456%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.11%. PennantPark Investment Corp. offers a yield of 20.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Great Elm Capital Corp. pays 387.92% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Investment Corp. pays out 191.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Elm Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $188K, which are smaller than PennantPark Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of $86.3M. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net income of -$22M is lower than PennantPark Investment Corp.'s net income of $9M. Notably, Great Elm Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while PennantPark Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Capital Corp. is 1.30x versus 2.33x for PennantPark Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. has a net margin of -11687.77% compared to Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net margin of -0.34%. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -24.03% beat Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.83%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40%. On the other hand Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.41%. Given that Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Great Elm Capital Corp., analysts believe Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. is more attractive than Great Elm Capital Corp..

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.521% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.595%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.11%. Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. offers a yield of 6.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Great Elm Capital Corp. pays 387.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. pays out 147.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Elm Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $188K, which are smaller than Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $32M. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net income of -$22M is lower than Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc.'s net income of -$107K. Notably, Great Elm Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Capital Corp. is 1.30x versus 0.96x for Silvercrest Asset Management Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blackrock TCP Capital Corp. has a net margin of -11687.77% compared to Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net margin of -52.38%. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -24.03% beat Blackrock TCP Capital Corp.'s return on equity of -12.2%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40%. On the other hand Blackrock TCP Capital Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.37%. Given that Great Elm Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Blackrock TCP Capital Corp., analysts believe Great Elm Capital Corp. is more attractive than Blackrock TCP Capital Corp..

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.685, which suggesting that the stock is 31.521% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackrock TCP Capital Corp. has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.281%.

Great Elm Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.11%. Blackrock TCP Capital Corp. offers a yield of 25.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Great Elm Capital Corp. pays 387.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackrock TCP Capital Corp. pays out 194.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Elm Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $188K, which are larger than Blackrock TCP Capital Corp. quarterly revenues of -$30M. Great Elm Capital Corp.'s net income of -$22M is higher than Blackrock TCP Capital Corp.'s net income of -$118.3M. Notably, Great Elm Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Blackrock TCP Capital Corp.'s PE ratio is 29.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Elm Capital Corp. is 1.30x versus 22.73x for Blackrock TCP Capital Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.