GCT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a net margin of 11.18% compared to GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 5.06%. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.81% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.25, signalling downside risk potential of -7.73%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $86.04 which suggests that it could grow by 0.74%. Given that Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has higher upside potential than GigaCloud Technology, Inc., analysts believe Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. is more attractive than GigaCloud Technology, Inc..

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.007%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. GigaCloud Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. pays out 26.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.4B. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net income of $37.2M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s net income of $274M. Notably, GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GigaCloud Technology, Inc. is 1.29x versus 2.02x for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ExlService Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 11.18% compared to GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 10.98%. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.81% beat ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.83%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.25, signalling downside risk potential of -7.73%. On the other hand ExlService Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $52.29 which suggests that it could grow by 21.31%. Given that ExlService Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than GigaCloud Technology, Inc., analysts believe ExlService Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than GigaCloud Technology, Inc..

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ExlService Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.157%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ExlService Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GigaCloud Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ExlService Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than ExlService Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $529.6M. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net income of $37.2M is lower than ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $58.2M. Notably, GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while ExlService Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GigaCloud Technology, Inc. is 1.29x versus 3.48x for ExlService Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement, Inc. has a net margin of 11.18% compared to GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 56.16%. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.81% beat Exodus Movement, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.02%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.25, signalling downside risk potential of -7.73%. On the other hand Exodus Movement, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.67 which suggests that it could grow by 142.85%. Given that Exodus Movement, Inc. has higher upside potential than GigaCloud Technology, Inc., analysts believe Exodus Movement, Inc. is more attractive than GigaCloud Technology, Inc..

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GigaCloud Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are larger than Exodus Movement, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.3M. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net income of $37.2M is higher than Exodus Movement, Inc.'s net income of $17M. Notably, GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Exodus Movement, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GigaCloud Technology, Inc. is 1.29x versus 3.41x for Exodus Movement, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hackett Group, Inc. has a net margin of 11.18% compared to GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 3.48%. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.81% beat The Hackett Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.71%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $37.25, signalling downside risk potential of -7.73%. On the other hand The Hackett Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.33 which suggests that it could grow by 42.09%. Given that The Hackett Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than GigaCloud Technology, Inc., analysts believe The Hackett Group, Inc. is more attractive than GigaCloud Technology, Inc..

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hackett Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.38%.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hackett Group, Inc. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. GigaCloud Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hackett Group, Inc. pays out 41.71% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hackett Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GigaCloud Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are larger than The Hackett Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $73.1M. GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s net income of $37.2M is higher than The Hackett Group, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, GigaCloud Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while The Hackett Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GigaCloud Technology, Inc. is 1.29x versus 1.82x for The Hackett Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.