FTLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -410.37%. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.72%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.57%. On the other hand Amaze Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 348.16%. Given that Amaze Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FitLife Brands, Inc., analysts believe Amaze Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FitLife Brands, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amaze Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amaze Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amaze Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are larger than Amaze Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is higher than Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.71x while Amaze Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 2.19x versus 0.34x for Amaze Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -821.05%. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.77%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.57%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FitLife Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, Inc., analysts believe FitLife Brands, Inc. is more attractive than RegalWorks Media, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a beta of -1.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.067%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9K. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is higher than RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s net income of -$15.6K. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.71x while RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 2.19x versus 184.10x for RegalWorks Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -480.68%. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.57%. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4060.6%. Given that Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than FitLife Brands, Inc., analysts believe Splash Beverage Group, Inc. is more attractive than FitLife Brands, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a beta of -1.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 235.4%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are larger than Splash Beverage Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is higher than Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s net income of -$9.9M. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.71x while Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 2.19x versus 1.73x for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 7.27%. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.08%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.57%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.71 which suggests that it could grow by 29.39%. Given that FitLife Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe FitLife Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.432, which suggesting that the stock is 56.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.382%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $733.5M. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $53.3M. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.71x while Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 2.19x versus 0.55x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.