FTLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of -821.05%. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.77%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 116.78%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FitLife Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, Inc., analysts believe FitLife Brands, Inc. is more attractive than RegalWorks Media, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a beta of -0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 179.879%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 268.72%. RegalWorks Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9K. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is higher than RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s net income of -$15.6K. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.72x while RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 1.30x versus 1,022.80x for RegalWorks Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 4.34%. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.46%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 116.78%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $85.29 which suggests that it could grow by 15.69%. Given that FitLife Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe FitLife Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.633, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.663%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 268.72%. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $677M. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $29.4M. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.72x while Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 1.30x versus 0.66x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Farms, Inc. has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of 7.64%. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat Vital Farms, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.38%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 116.78%. On the other hand Vital Farms, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.90 which suggests that it could grow by 153.38%. Given that Vital Farms, Inc. has higher upside potential than FitLife Brands, Inc., analysts believe Vital Farms, Inc. is more attractive than FitLife Brands, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Farms, Inc. has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.951%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 268.72%. Vital Farms, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Farms, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are smaller than Vital Farms, Inc. quarterly revenues of $213.6M. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is lower than Vital Farms, Inc.'s net income of $16.3M. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.72x while Vital Farms, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 1.30x versus 0.72x for Vital Farms, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waldencast Plc has a net margin of 3.92% compared to FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net margin of --. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.59% beat Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 116.78%. On the other hand Waldencast Plc has an analysts' consensus of $2.03 which suggests that it could grow by 125.3%. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than FitLife Brands, Inc., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than FitLife Brands, Inc..

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FitLife Brands, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 268.72%. Waldencast Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FitLife Brands, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waldencast Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FitLife Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.5M, which are larger than Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues of --. FitLife Brands, Inc.'s net income of $921K is higher than Waldencast Plc's net income of --. Notably, FitLife Brands, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.72x while Waldencast Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FitLife Brands, Inc. is 1.30x versus 0.38x for Waldencast Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.