FMST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.65% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 134.19%. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.096% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.315%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.65% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 134.19%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.49 which suggests that it could grow by 56.79%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Seabridge Gold, Inc., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Seabridge Gold, Inc..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.096% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.253%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TMC the metals co., Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.65% beat TMC the metals co., Inc.'s return on equity of -3890.83%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 134.19%. On the other hand TMC the metals co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.20 which suggests that it could grow by 69.7%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than TMC the metals co., Inc., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than TMC the metals co., Inc..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.096% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TMC the metals co., Inc. has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.014%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TMC the metals co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TMC the metals co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TMC the metals co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is higher than TMC the metals co., Inc.'s net income of -$184.5M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TMC the metals co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for TMC the metals co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -10.81%. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.65% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 134.19%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.096% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 19.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1824.925%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.4M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus 0.01x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.