FMST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Endeavour Silver Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -30.56%. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -14.06% beat Endeavour Silver Corp.'s return on equity of -19.75%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.32%. On the other hand Endeavour Silver Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.9167 which suggests that it could grow by 14.12%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Endeavour Silver Corp., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Endeavour Silver Corp..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.756, which suggesting that the stock is 75.646% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Endeavour Silver Corp. has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.954%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Endeavour Silver Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Endeavour Silver Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Endeavour Silver Corp. quarterly revenues of $137.3M. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9M is higher than Endeavour Silver Corp.'s net income of -$42M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Endeavour Silver Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus 7.18x for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of -27.31%. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -14.06% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.32%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty Corp., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Gold Royalty Corp..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.756, which suggesting that the stock is 75.646% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus 51.63x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -14.06% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.32%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.03 which suggests that it could grow by 59.28%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Seabridge Gold, Inc., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than Seabridge Gold, Inc..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.756, which suggesting that the stock is 75.646% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TMC the metals co., Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net margin of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of -14.06% beat TMC the metals co., Inc.'s return on equity of -3890.83%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 78.32%. On the other hand TMC the metals co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.99%. Given that Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has higher upside potential than TMC the metals co., Inc., analysts believe Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is more attractive than TMC the metals co., Inc..

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 1.756, which suggesting that the stock is 75.646% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TMC the metals co., Inc. has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.014%.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TMC the metals co., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TMC the metals co., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TMC the metals co., Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of -$1.9M is higher than TMC the metals co., Inc.'s net income of -$184.5M. Notably, Foremost Clean Energy Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TMC the metals co., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. is -- versus -- for TMC the metals co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.