FLIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ConnectOne Bancorp has a net margin of 15.28% compared to First of Long Island's net margin of 29.76%. First of Long Island's return on equity of 4.49% beat ConnectOne Bancorp's return on equity of 6.01%.

First of Long Island has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 45.52%. On the other hand ConnectOne Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $30.13 which suggests that it could grow by 34.91%. Given that First of Long Island has higher upside potential than ConnectOne Bancorp, analysts believe First of Long Island is more attractive than ConnectOne Bancorp.

First of Long Island has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ConnectOne Bancorp has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.885%.

First of Long Island has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.38%. ConnectOne Bancorp offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. First of Long Island pays 110.81% of its earnings as a dividend. ConnectOne Bancorp pays out 45.15% of its earnings as a dividend. ConnectOne Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First of Long Island's is not.

First of Long Island quarterly revenues are $21.2M, which are smaller than ConnectOne Bancorp quarterly revenues of $68.5M. First of Long Island's net income of $3.2M is lower than ConnectOne Bancorp's net income of $20.4M. Notably, First of Long Island's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while ConnectOne Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First of Long Island is 3.02x versus 3.26x for ConnectOne Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 15.28% compared to First of Long Island's net margin of 20.42%. First of Long Island's return on equity of 4.49% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

First of Long Island has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 45.52%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.17%. Given that First of Long Island has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe First of Long Island is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

First of Long Island has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

First of Long Island has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.38%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. First of Long Island pays 110.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First of Long Island's is not.

First of Long Island quarterly revenues are $21.2M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. First of Long Island's net income of $3.2M is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, First of Long Island's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 17.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First of Long Island is 3.02x versus 3.06x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 15.28% compared to First of Long Island's net margin of 28.72%. First of Long Island's return on equity of 4.49% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

First of Long Island has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 45.52%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that First of Long Island has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe First of Long Island is more attractive than Park National.

First of Long Island has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

First of Long Island has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.38%. Park National offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. First of Long Island pays 110.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First of Long Island's is not.

First of Long Island quarterly revenues are $21.2M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. First of Long Island's net income of $3.2M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, First of Long Island's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Park National's PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First of Long Island is 3.02x versus 4.62x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 15.28% compared to First of Long Island's net margin of 25.81%. First of Long Island's return on equity of 4.49% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

First of Long Island has a consensus price target of $16.56, signalling upside risk potential of 45.52%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.86%. Given that First of Long Island has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe First of Long Island is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

First of Long Island has a beta of 0.693, which suggesting that the stock is 30.701% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.208%.

First of Long Island has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.38%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. First of Long Island pays 110.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First of Long Island's is not.

First of Long Island quarterly revenues are $21.2M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. First of Long Island's net income of $3.2M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, First of Long Island's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First of Long Island is 3.02x versus 2.85x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.