ECDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of 38.61% compared to E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net margin of -600505.41%. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 127288.54%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 320.17%. Given that E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has higher upside potential than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc., analysts believe E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is more attractive than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc..

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 400.215%.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is 0.01x versus 180.05x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of 38.61% compared to E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net margin of -290.7%. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 127288.54%. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.06 which suggests that it could grow by 52.88%. Given that E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, Inc., analysts believe E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is more attractive than Lucid Group, Inc..

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.52%.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is 0.01x versus 18.00x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a net margin of 38.61% compared to E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net margin of -328.21%. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65%.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 127288.54%. On the other hand Workhorse Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 40.29%. Given that E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, Inc., analysts believe E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is more attractive than Workhorse Group, Inc..

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.607%.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are larger than Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is higher than Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for E.C.D. Automotive Design, Inc. is 0.01x versus 0.34x for Workhorse Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.