ECDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -10.44% compared to ECD Automotive Design's net margin of -863177.78%. ECD Automotive Design's return on equity of -- beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -159.67%.

ECD Automotive Design has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3983302.89%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than ECD Automotive Design, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than ECD Automotive Design.

ECD Automotive Design has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ECD Automotive Design has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ECD Automotive Design pays -158.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ECD Automotive Design quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of $9K. ECD Automotive Design's net income of -$926.1K is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of -$77.7M. Notably, ECD Automotive Design's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECD Automotive Design is 1.10x versus 30.36x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canoo has a net margin of -10.44% compared to ECD Automotive Design's net margin of -819.84%. ECD Automotive Design's return on equity of -- beat Canoo's return on equity of -69.19%.

ECD Automotive Design has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand Canoo has an analysts' consensus of $42.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3246.46%. Given that Canoo has higher upside potential than ECD Automotive Design, analysts believe Canoo is more attractive than ECD Automotive Design.

ECD Automotive Design has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canoo has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.553%.

ECD Automotive Design has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ECD Automotive Design pays -158.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Canoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ECD Automotive Design quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are larger than Canoo quarterly revenues of $891K. ECD Automotive Design's net income of -$926.1K is lower than Canoo's net income of $3.3M. Notably, ECD Automotive Design's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canoo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECD Automotive Design is 1.10x versus -- for Canoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -10.44% compared to ECD Automotive Design's net margin of -496.14%. ECD Automotive Design's return on equity of -- beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

ECD Automotive Design has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could fall by -17.51%. Given that ECD Automotive Design has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe ECD Automotive Design is more attractive than Lucid Group.

ECD Automotive Design has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ECD Automotive Design has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ECD Automotive Design pays -158.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ECD Automotive Design quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are smaller than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. ECD Automotive Design's net income of -$926.1K is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, ECD Automotive Design's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECD Automotive Design is 1.10x versus 10.52x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -10.44% compared to ECD Automotive Design's net margin of -1001.53%. ECD Automotive Design's return on equity of -- beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

ECD Automotive Design has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 700%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that ECD Automotive Design has higher upside potential than Workhorse Group, analysts believe ECD Automotive Design is more attractive than Workhorse Group.

ECD Automotive Design has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.698, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.77%.

ECD Automotive Design has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ECD Automotive Design pays -158.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ECD Automotive Design quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. ECD Automotive Design's net income of -$926.1K is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, ECD Automotive Design's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ECD Automotive Design is 1.10x versus 1.75x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.