DWSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net margin of -81.01%. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s return on equity of -19.39% beat Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -74.23%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand Barnwell Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dawson Geophysical Co. has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, Inc., analysts believe Dawson Geophysical Co. is more attractive than Barnwell Industries, Inc..

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.662%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Barnwell Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Dawson Geophysical Co. pays 239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dawson Geophysical Co. quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are larger than Barnwell Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3M. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net income of -$1.2M is higher than Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Dawson Geophysical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical Co. is 0.82x versus 0.81x for Barnwell Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Core Laboratories Inc. has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net margin of 10.8%. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s return on equity of -19.39% beat Core Laboratories Inc.'s return on equity of 12.42%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand Core Laboratories Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could fall by -15.31%. Given that Dawson Geophysical Co. has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories Inc., analysts believe Dawson Geophysical Co. is more attractive than Core Laboratories Inc..

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories Inc. has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.262%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories Inc. offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Dawson Geophysical Co. pays 239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories Inc. pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dawson Geophysical Co.'s is not.

Dawson Geophysical Co. quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are smaller than Core Laboratories Inc. quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Core Laboratories Inc.'s net income of $14.5M. Notably, Dawson Geophysical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Core Laboratories Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical Co. is 0.82x versus 1.51x for Core Laboratories Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net margin of 0.36%. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s return on equity of -19.39% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.34%. Given that Dawson Geophysical Co. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Dawson Geophysical Co. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.59%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Dawson Geophysical Co. pays 239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dawson Geophysical Co.'s is not.

Dawson Geophysical Co. quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, Dawson Geophysical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 18.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical Co. is 0.82x versus 1.09x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net margin of 6.01%. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s return on equity of -19.39% beat National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s return on equity of 7.63%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 135.29%. On the other hand National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $19.80 which suggests that it could grow by 31.39%. Given that Dawson Geophysical Co. has higher upside potential than National Energy Services Reunited Corp., analysts believe Dawson Geophysical Co. is more attractive than National Energy Services Reunited Corp..

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a beta of 0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.201%.

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dawson Geophysical Co. pays 239.38% of its earnings as a dividend. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dawson Geophysical Co. quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are smaller than National Energy Services Reunited Corp. quarterly revenues of $295.3M. Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net income of -$1.2M is lower than National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, Dawson Geophysical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dawson Geophysical Co. is 0.82x versus 1.16x for National Energy Services Reunited Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.