ACDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dawson Geophysical Co. has a net margin of -22.92% compared to ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net margin of -5.07%. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -28.29% beat Dawson Geophysical Co.'s return on equity of -19.39%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.90, signalling downside risk potential of -8.67%. On the other hand Dawson Geophysical Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 104.08%. Given that Dawson Geophysical Co. has higher upside potential than ProFrac Holding Corp., analysts believe Dawson Geophysical Co. is more attractive than ProFrac Holding Corp..

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dawson Geophysical Co. has a beta of -0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.572%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dawson Geophysical Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. ProFrac Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dawson Geophysical Co. pays out 239.38% of its earnings as a dividend.

ProFrac Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $403.1M, which are larger than Dawson Geophysical Co. quarterly revenues of $22.7M. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net income of -$92.4M is lower than Dawson Geophysical Co.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, ProFrac Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while Dawson Geophysical Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding Corp. is 0.35x versus 0.95x for Dawson Geophysical Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -22.92% compared to ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net margin of -40.95%. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -28.29% beat Empire Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of -30.21%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.90, signalling downside risk potential of -8.67%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProFrac Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum Corp., analysts believe ProFrac Holding Corp. is more attractive than Empire Petroleum Corp..

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.625%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Empire Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProFrac Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProFrac Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $403.1M, which are larger than Empire Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.4M. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net income of -$92.4M is lower than Empire Petroleum Corp.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, ProFrac Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while Empire Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding Corp. is 0.35x versus 2.92x for Empire Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a net margin of -22.92% compared to ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net margin of 6.01%. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -28.29% beat National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s return on equity of 7.63%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.90, signalling downside risk potential of -8.67%. On the other hand National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $19.80 which suggests that it could grow by 34.42%. Given that National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has higher upside potential than ProFrac Holding Corp., analysts believe National Energy Services Reunited Corp. is more attractive than ProFrac Holding Corp..

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a beta of 0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.201%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProFrac Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProFrac Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $403.1M, which are larger than National Energy Services Reunited Corp. quarterly revenues of $295.3M. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net income of -$92.4M is lower than National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, ProFrac Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding Corp. is 0.35x versus 1.14x for National Energy Services Reunited Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smart Sand, Inc. has a net margin of -22.92% compared to ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net margin of 3.24%. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -28.29% beat Smart Sand, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.64%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.90, signalling downside risk potential of -8.67%. On the other hand Smart Sand, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.29%. Given that Smart Sand, Inc. has more downside risk than ProFrac Holding Corp., analysts believe ProFrac Holding Corp. is more attractive than Smart Sand, Inc..

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Sand, Inc. has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.044%.

ProFrac Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smart Sand, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ProFrac Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Sand, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProFrac Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $403.1M, which are larger than Smart Sand, Inc. quarterly revenues of $92.8M. ProFrac Holding Corp.'s net income of -$92.4M is lower than Smart Sand, Inc.'s net income of $3M. Notably, ProFrac Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while Smart Sand, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding Corp. is 0.35x versus 0.41x for Smart Sand, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.