CRML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Metals Corp.'s net margin of -78.02%. Critical Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -8.99%.

Critical Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MP Materials Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $79.29 which suggests that it could grow by 48.53%. Given that MP Materials Corp. has higher upside potential than Critical Metals Corp., analysts believe MP Materials Corp. is more attractive than Critical Metals Corp..

Critical Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.479%.

Critical Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MP Materials Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Critical Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues of $53.6M. Critical Metals Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than MP Materials Corp.'s net income of -$41.8M. Notably, Critical Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MP Materials Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Metals Corp. is -- versus 38.19x for MP Materials Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Critical Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s return on equity of -139.19%.

Critical Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NioCorp Developments Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $13.1667 which suggests that it could grow by 131.4%. Given that NioCorp Developments Ltd. has higher upside potential than Critical Metals Corp., analysts believe NioCorp Developments Ltd. is more attractive than Critical Metals Corp..

Critical Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments Ltd. has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.838%.

Critical Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NioCorp Developments Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Critical Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NioCorp Developments Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Critical Metals Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s net income of -$40.8M. Notably, Critical Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NioCorp Developments Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Metals Corp. is -- versus 5,553.42x for NioCorp Developments Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Critical Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Critical Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.31%. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Critical Metals Corp., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Critical Metals Corp..

Critical Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Critical Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Critical Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Critical Metals Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Critical Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nova Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Metals Corp. is -- versus -- for Nova Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USA Rare Earth, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Critical Metals Corp.'s net margin of --. Critical Metals Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s return on equity of -3578.6%.

Critical Metals Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand USA Rare Earth, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.20 which suggests that it could grow by 101.33%. Given that USA Rare Earth, Inc. has higher upside potential than Critical Metals Corp., analysts believe USA Rare Earth, Inc. is more attractive than Critical Metals Corp..

Critical Metals Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USA Rare Earth, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Critical Metals Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. USA Rare Earth, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Critical Metals Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. USA Rare Earth, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Critical Metals Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than USA Rare Earth, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Critical Metals Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s net income of -$157M. Notably, Critical Metals Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while USA Rare Earth, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Critical Metals Corp. is -- versus -- for USA Rare Earth, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.