CETY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -552.5% compared to Clean Energy Technologies's net margin of -2.72%. Clean Energy Technologies's return on equity of -139.65% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 146.91%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Clean Energy Technologies, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Clean Energy Technologies.

Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 124.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.721%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $235.2K, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Clean Energy Technologies's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, Clean Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 30.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Technologies is 8.13x versus 0.25x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -552.5% compared to Clean Energy Technologies's net margin of 1.78%. Clean Energy Technologies's return on equity of -139.65% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 463.38%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Clean Energy Technologies, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Clean Energy Technologies.

Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 124.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.36%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $235.2K, which are smaller than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Clean Energy Technologies's net income of -$1.3M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Clean Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Technologies is 8.13x versus 0.72x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -552.5% compared to Clean Energy Technologies's net margin of -814.55%. Clean Energy Technologies's return on equity of -139.65% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Energy Technologies has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Clean Energy Technologies is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 124.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $235.2K, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Clean Energy Technologies's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Clean Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Technologies is 8.13x versus 7.64x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -552.5% compared to Clean Energy Technologies's net margin of -11.09%. Clean Energy Technologies's return on equity of -139.65% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 339.68%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Clean Energy Technologies, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Clean Energy Technologies.

Clean Energy Technologies has a beta of -0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 124.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

Clean Energy Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Technologies quarterly revenues are $235.2K, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Clean Energy Technologies's net income of -$1.3M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Clean Energy Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Technologies is 8.13x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.