CART Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoorDash, Inc. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Maplebear, Inc.'s net margin of 7.05%. Maplebear, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.26% beat DoorDash, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.16%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.42, signalling upside risk potential of 18.31%. On the other hand DoorDash, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $276.17 which suggests that it could grow by 24.13%. Given that DoorDash, Inc. has higher upside potential than Maplebear, Inc., analysts believe DoorDash, Inc. is more attractive than Maplebear, Inc..

Maplebear, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoorDash, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoorDash, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoorDash, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than DoorDash, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Maplebear, Inc.'s net income of $144M is lower than DoorDash, Inc.'s net income of $243M. Notably, Maplebear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while DoorDash, Inc.'s PE ratio is 112.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear, Inc. is 3.30x versus 7.70x for DoorDash, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group, Inc. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Maplebear, Inc.'s net margin of 21.85%. Maplebear, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.26% beat Expedia Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 56.21%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.42, signalling upside risk potential of 18.31%. On the other hand Expedia Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $269.79 which suggests that it could grow by 2.81%. Given that Maplebear, Inc. has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, Inc., analysts believe Maplebear, Inc. is more attractive than Expedia Group, Inc..

Maplebear, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.941%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Maplebear, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than Expedia Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Maplebear, Inc.'s net income of $144M is lower than Expedia Group, Inc.'s net income of $964M. Notably, Maplebear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Expedia Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear, Inc. is 3.30x versus 2.41x for Expedia Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel, Inc. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Maplebear, Inc.'s net margin of 16.04%. Maplebear, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.26% beat Mattel, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.4%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.42, signalling upside risk potential of 18.31%. On the other hand Mattel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.92 which suggests that it could grow by 12.66%. Given that Maplebear, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mattel, Inc., analysts believe Maplebear, Inc. is more attractive than Mattel, Inc..

Maplebear, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel, Inc. has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.629%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than Mattel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Maplebear, Inc.'s net income of $144M is lower than Mattel, Inc.'s net income of $278.4M. Notably, Maplebear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Mattel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear, Inc. is 3.30x versus 1.33x for Mattel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to Maplebear, Inc.'s net margin of 4.94%. Maplebear, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.26% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.42, signalling upside risk potential of 18.31%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $392.93 which suggests that it could fall by -12.05%. Given that Maplebear, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe Maplebear, Inc. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Maplebear, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

Maplebear, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maplebear, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maplebear, Inc. quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. Maplebear, Inc.'s net income of $144M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Maplebear, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 298.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maplebear, Inc. is 3.30x versus 16.45x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.