3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Sell
50
CANQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.53
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$28.52 - $28.53
52-week range:
$24.05 - $29.74
Dividend yield:
4.13%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
264
Avg. volume:
1.2K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPQ
Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
$28.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 4.13% | -- |
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
$20.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.70 | 3.4% | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
$18.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 3.45% | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
$29.81 | -- | -- | -- | $2.07 | 0.02% | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
$18.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 4.97% | -- |
|
SPQ
Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF
|
$27.08 | -- | -- | -- | $4.37 | 17.24% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
-- | 0.308 | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -0.273 | -- | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -1.556 | -- | -- |
|
SPQ
Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF
|
-- | 1.273 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPQ
Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or AMPD?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or AMPD?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has higher upside potential than CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF, analysts believe Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is more attractive than CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF0 0 0 AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or AMPD More Risky?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or AMPD?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or AMPD?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is -- versus -- for CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- -- AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or FXP?
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or FXP?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50, analysts believe Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF0 0 0 FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 500 0 0 -
Is CANQ or FXP More Risky?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.945%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or FXP?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or FXP?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- -- FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or MVPL?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or MVPL?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF, analysts believe Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is more attractive than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF0 0 0 MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or MVPL More Risky?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or MVPL?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.07 per share. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or MVPL?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or MYY?
ProShares Short MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Short MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or MYY?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Short MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Short MidCap400, analysts believe Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is more attractive than ProShares Short MidCap400.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF0 0 0 MYYProShares Short MidCap4000 0 0 -
Is CANQ or MYY More Risky?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Short MidCap400 has a beta of -1.120, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 212.044%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or MYY?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. ProShares Short MidCap400 offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Short MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or MYY?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Short MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Short MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Short MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Short MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or SPQ?
Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- SPQSimplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or SPQ?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF, analysts believe Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is more attractive than Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF0 0 0 SPQSimplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or SPQ More Risky?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or SPQ?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.13%. Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF offers a yield of 17.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.37 per share. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or SPQ?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Simplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- -- SPQSimplify US Equity PLUS QIS ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 30.64% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is up 22.41% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is up 18.99% over the past day.
