Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
47
CANQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.50
Seasonality move
:
3.16%
Day range:
$30.50 - $30.58
52-week range:
$25.11 - $31.60
Dividend yield:
4.94%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.4K
Avg. volume:
7.3K
1-year change:
8.68%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF
|
$30.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 4.94% | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
$31.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 2.06% | -- |
|
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
|
$31.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
|
$23.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.80 | 3.38% | -- |
|
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
|
$23.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.14% | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
$36.98 | -- | -- | -- | $2.07 | 0.02% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF
|
-- | 0.751 | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | 1.345 | -- | -- |
|
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
|
-- | 0.670 | -- | -- |
|
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
|
-- | 0.239 | -- | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | 2.151 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CANQ
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HFGM
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or DRAI?
Draco Evolution AI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Draco Evolution AI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or DRAI?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Draco Evolution AI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has higher upside potential than Draco Evolution AI ETF, analysts believe Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is more attractive than Draco Evolution AI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF0 0 0 DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or DRAI More Risky?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Draco Evolution AI ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or DRAI?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Draco Evolution AI ETF offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Draco Evolution AI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or DRAI?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Draco Evolution AI ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Draco Evolution AI ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Draco Evolution AI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is -- versus -- for Draco Evolution AI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or HFGM?
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- HFGMUnlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or HFGM?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has higher upside potential than Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF, analysts believe Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is more attractive than Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF0 0 0 HFGMUnlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or HFGM More Risky?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or HFGM?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or HFGM?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is -- versus -- for Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- -- HFGMUnlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or HFND?
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- HFNDUnlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or HFND?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has higher upside potential than Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF, analysts believe Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is more attractive than Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF0 0 0 HFNDUnlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or HFND More Risky?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or HFND?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or HFND?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is -- versus -- for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- -- HFNDUnlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or LALT?
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- LALTFirst Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or LALT?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF, analysts believe Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is more attractive than First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF0 0 0 LALTFirst Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or LALT More Risky?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or LALT?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or LALT?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- -- LALTFirst Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CANQ or MVPL?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net margin of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CANQ or MVPL?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has higher upside potential than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF, analysts believe Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is more attractive than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF0 0 0 MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF0 0 0 -
Is CANQ or MVPL More Risky?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CANQ or MVPL?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.07 per share. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CANQ or MVPL?
Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF quarterly revenues of --. Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net income of --. Notably, Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF is -- versus -- for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CANQCalamos Nasdaq Equity & Income ETF-- -- -- -- MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 3.18% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 47.34% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.21% over the past day.
