Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
44
MVPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.25
Seasonality move
:
5.91%
Day range:
$35.22 - $35.63
52-week range:
$23.52 - $38.35
Dividend yield:
1.12%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
260
Avg. volume:
254
1-year change:
24.74%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
$35.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.40 | 1.12% | -- |
|
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
|
$58.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1% | -- |
|
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
|
$159.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 0% | -- |
|
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary
|
$47.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.22% | -- |
|
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials
|
$58.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 0.72% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | 2.193 | -- | -- |
|
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
|
-- | 0.245 | -- | -- |
|
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
|
-- | 2.002 | -- | -- |
|
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary
|
-- | 2.430 | -- | -- |
|
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials
|
-- | 1.436 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPL
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPL or EZJ?
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- EZJProShares Ultra MSCI Japan-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPL or EZJ?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is more attractive than ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF0 0 0 EZJProShares Ultra MSCI Japan0 0 0 -
Is MVPL or EZJ More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.943%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPL or EZJ?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPL or EZJ?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- -- EZJProShares Ultra MSCI Japan-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPL or SPYQ?
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's return on equity of -- beat Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- SPYQTradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPL or SPYQ?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has higher upside potential than Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is more attractive than Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF0 0 0 SPYQTradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF0 0 0 -
Is MVPL or SPYQ More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPL or SPYQ?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPL or SPYQ?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net income of -- is lower than Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is -- versus -- for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- -- SPYQTradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPL or UCC?
ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- UCCProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPL or UCC?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF0 0 0 UCCProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary0 0 0 -
Is MVPL or UCC More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary has a beta of 2.280, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.984%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPL or UCC?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPL or UCC?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- -- UCCProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPL or UXI?
ProShares Ultra Industrials has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Industrials's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- UXIProShares Ultra Industrials-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPL or UXI?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Industrials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Industrials, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Industrials.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF0 0 0 UXIProShares Ultra Industrials0 0 0 -
Is MVPL or UXI More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Industrials has a beta of 2.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.846%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPL or UXI?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.12%. ProShares Ultra Industrials offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Industrials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPL or UXI?
Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Industrials quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Industrials's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Industrials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Industrials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF-- -- -- -- UXIProShares Ultra Industrials-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 5.43% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.
