Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
36
AMPD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.63
Seasonality move
:
0.57%
Day range:
$20.63 - $20.63
52-week range:
$18.01 - $24.88
Dividend yield:
3.4%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-13.87%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
$20.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.70 | 3.4% | -- |
|
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
|
$9.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
$18.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.24 | 3.46% | -- |
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
$28.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 4.19% | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
$18.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 4.94% | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
$9.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 6.42% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
-- | 0.308 | -- | -- |
|
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
|
-- | 0.970 | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -1.185 | -- | -- |
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -1.556 | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -3.150 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMPD
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AMPD or BWET?
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net margin of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- BWETBreakwave Tanker Shipping ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AMPD or BWET?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has higher upside potential than Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, analysts believe CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is more attractive than Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF0 0 0 BWETBreakwave Tanker Shipping ETF0 0 0 -
Is AMPD or BWET More Risky?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMPD or BWET?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMPD or BWET?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF quarterly revenues of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF's net income of --. Notably, CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is -- versus -- for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- -- BWETBreakwave Tanker Shipping ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AMPD or BZQ?
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a net margin of -- compared to CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net margin of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AMPD or BZQ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped, analysts believe CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF0 0 0 BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped0 0 0 -
Is AMPD or BZQ More Risky?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a beta of -2.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 319.925%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMPD or BZQ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMPD or BZQ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped quarterly revenues of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's net income of --. Notably, CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- -- BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AMPD or CANQ?
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net margin of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AMPD or CANQ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has higher upside potential than Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF, analysts believe CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is more attractive than Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF0 0 0 CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is AMPD or CANQ More Risky?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMPD or CANQ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMPD or CANQ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is -- versus -- for Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- -- CANQCalamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AMPD or MYY?
ProShares Short MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net margin of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Short MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AMPD or MYY?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Short MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Short MidCap400, analysts believe CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is more attractive than ProShares Short MidCap400.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF0 0 0 MYYProShares Short MidCap4000 0 0 -
Is AMPD or MYY More Risky?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Short MidCap400 has a beta of -1.120, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 212.044%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMPD or MYY?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. ProShares Short MidCap400 offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Short MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMPD or MYY?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Short MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Short MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Short MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Short MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AMPD or MZZ?
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net margin of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap400-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AMPD or MZZ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400, analysts believe CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF0 0 0 MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap4000 0 0 -
Is AMPD or MZZ More Risky?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a beta of -2.154, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.428%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMPD or MZZ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 offers a yield of 6.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMPD or MZZ?
CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMPDCNIC ICE US Carbon Neutral Power Futures Index ETF-- -- -- -- MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap400-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
