BENF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California First Leasing Corp. has a net margin of -6318.18% compared to Beneficient's net margin of --. Beneficient's return on equity of -2087.16% beat California First Leasing Corp.'s return on equity of 13.72%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand California First Leasing Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than California First Leasing Corp., analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than California First Leasing Corp..

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing Corp. has a beta of 0.216, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.38%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California First Leasing Corp. offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $198K, which are larger than California First Leasing Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Beneficient's net income of -$12.5M is higher than California First Leasing Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while California First Leasing Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 190.58x versus 37.93x for California First Leasing Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a net margin of -6318.18% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 19.46%. Beneficient's return on equity of -2087.16% beat Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s return on equity of 26.48%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of $66.67 which suggests that it could grow by 12.25%. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York), analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York).

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) has a beta of 1.263, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.346%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) pays out 83.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $198K, which are smaller than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York) quarterly revenues of $157.8M. Beneficient's net income of -$12.5M is lower than Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s net income of $30.7M. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)'s PE ratio is 21.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 190.58x versus 5.69x for Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of -6318.18% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 23.6%. Beneficient's return on equity of -2087.16% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.92%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.376%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 33.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $198K, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.3M. Beneficient's net income of -$12.5M is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 190.58x versus 2.98x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -6318.18% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 7.34%. Beneficient's return on equity of -2087.16% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.21%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 185.71%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.77 which suggests that it could grow by 12.09%. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.171%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 13.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $198K, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $76.4M. Beneficient's net income of -$12.5M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $5.6M. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 32.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 190.58x versus 3.31x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.