BENF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment Corp. has a net margin of -9525% compared to Beneficient's net margin of -616.21%. Beneficient's return on equity of -434.05% beat Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 18.81%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 202.71%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.33%. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.408%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gladstone Investment Corp. offers a yield of 6.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $188K, which are larger than Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4.7M. Beneficient's net income of -$17.9M is lower than Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $28.7M. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while Gladstone Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 7.16x versus 5.85x for Gladstone Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -9525% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 52.21%. Beneficient's return on equity of -434.05% beat Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.39%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 202.71%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.12%. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, Inc., analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC, Inc..

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.436, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.439%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 10.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 113.7% of its earnings as a dividend.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $188K, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.4M. Beneficient's net income of -$17.9M is lower than Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 7.16x versus 4.73x for Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -9525% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 43.19%. Beneficient's return on equity of -434.05% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 202.71%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 5.27%. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $188K, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Beneficient's net income of -$17.9M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 7.16x versus 4.82x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -9525% compared to Beneficient's net margin of 29.17%. Beneficient's return on equity of -434.05% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

Beneficient has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 202.71%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 0.37%. Given that Beneficient has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe Beneficient is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

Beneficient has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

Beneficient has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Beneficient pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Beneficient quarterly revenues are $188K, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Beneficient's net income of -$17.9M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, Beneficient's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.05x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Beneficient is 7.16x versus 3.92x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.