AMAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.34x versus 2.91x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetroCity Bankshares has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 45.26%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat MetroCity Bankshares's return on equity of 15.08%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand MetroCity Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.77%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than MetroCity Bankshares, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than MetroCity Bankshares.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetroCity Bankshares has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.832%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. MetroCity Bankshares offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. MetroCity Bankshares pays out 35.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than MetroCity Bankshares quarterly revenues of $36.9M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is higher than MetroCity Bankshares's net income of $16.7M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while MetroCity Bankshares's PE ratio is 14.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.34x versus 6.16x for MetroCity Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 27.77%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Park National offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.34x versus 5.67x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 27.47%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.18%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Penns Woods Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.813%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Penns Woods Bancorp offers a yield of 4.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Penns Woods Bancorp pays out 55.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is higher than Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Penns Woods Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.34x versus 3.52x for Penns Woods Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.