PLBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Hawaiian, Inc. has a net margin of 16.06% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 24.52%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.38% beat First Hawaiian, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.7%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 19.26%. On the other hand First Hawaiian, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.28%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, Inc., analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than First Hawaiian, Inc..

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Hawaiian, Inc. has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.545%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. First Hawaiian, Inc. offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.52% of its earnings as a dividend. First Hawaiian, Inc. pays out 57.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $32M, which are smaller than First Hawaiian, Inc. quarterly revenues of $301.1M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $5.1M is lower than First Hawaiian, Inc.'s net income of $73.8M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.66x while First Hawaiian, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.79x versus 2.89x for First Hawaiian, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 16.06% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 23.62%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.38% beat OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.8%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 19.26%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.62%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc..

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.287, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.332%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.52% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plumas Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $32M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $5.1M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.3M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.66x while OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.79x versus 0.91x for OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National Corp. has a net margin of 16.06% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 27.82%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.38% beat Park National Corp.'s return on equity of 13.78%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 19.26%. On the other hand Park National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $180.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.71%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National Corp., analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Park National Corp..

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National Corp. has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.635%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Park National Corp. offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National Corp. pays out 45.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $32M, which are smaller than Park National Corp. quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $5.1M is lower than Park National Corp.'s net income of $47.2M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.66x while Park National Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.79x versus 3.90x for Park National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial Corp. has a net margin of 16.06% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 19.46%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.38% beat Tompkins Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.34%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $54.33, signalling upside risk potential of 19.26%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.42%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial Corp., analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Tompkins Financial Corp..

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.596, which suggesting that the stock is 40.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.709%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Tompkins Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial Corp. pays out 49.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $32M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $121.7M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $5.1M is lower than Tompkins Financial Corp.'s net income of $23.7M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.66x while Tompkins Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.79x versus 2.28x for Tompkins Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.