PLBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bank of Marin Bancorp has a net margin of 39.47% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 18%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.9% beat Bank of Marin Bancorp's return on equity of 2.25%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $57.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand Bank of Marin Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $30.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.91%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Bank of Marin Bancorp, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Bank of Marin Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of Marin Bancorp has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.438%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Bank of Marin Bancorp offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 26.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Marin Bancorp pays out 192.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Plumas Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Bank of Marin Bancorp's is not.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $27.8M, which are smaller than Bank of Marin Bancorp quarterly revenues of $41.8M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $11M is higher than Bank of Marin Bancorp's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while Bank of Marin Bancorp's PE ratio is 44.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 3.05x versus 3.13x for Bank of Marin Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 39.47% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 23.62%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.9% beat OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.8%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $57.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.17%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc..

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.272, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.848%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 26.43% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plumas Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $27.8M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $11M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.3M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 3.05x versus 1.03x for OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National Corp. has a net margin of 39.47% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 27.82%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.9% beat Park National Corp.'s return on equity of 13.78%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $57.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand Park National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $180.33 which suggests that it could grow by 11.77%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National Corp., analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Park National Corp..

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National Corp. has a beta of 0.733, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.676%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Park National Corp. offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 26.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National Corp. pays out 45.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $27.8M, which are smaller than Park National Corp. quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $11M is lower than Park National Corp.'s net income of $47.2M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while Park National Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 3.05x versus 3.96x for Park National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial Corp. has a net margin of 39.47% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 19.46%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 13.9% beat Tompkins Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.34%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $57.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.01%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.44%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial Corp., analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Tompkins Financial Corp..

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.13%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.41%. Tompkins Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 26.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial Corp. pays out 49.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $27.8M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $121.7M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $11M is lower than Tompkins Financial Corp.'s net income of $23.7M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while Tompkins Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 3.05x versus 2.35x for Tompkins Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.