FULT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Banc of California has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 4.13%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand Banc of California has an analysts' consensus of $18.80 which suggests that it could grow by 21.92%. Given that Banc of California has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial, analysts believe Banc of California is more attractive than Fulton Financial.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Banc of California has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.759%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Banc of California offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Banc of California pays out -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Fulton Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are larger than Banc of California quarterly revenues of $212.7M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is higher than Banc of California's net income of $8.8M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while Banc of California's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 5.01x for Banc of California. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comerica has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 22.69%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Comerica's return on equity of 9.06%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand Comerica has an analysts' consensus of $71.49 which suggests that it could grow by 16.89%. Given that Comerica has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial, analysts believe Comerica is more attractive than Fulton Financial.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comerica has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.583%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Comerica offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Comerica pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are smaller than Comerica quarterly revenues of $811M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is lower than Comerica's net income of $184M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while Comerica's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 2.55x for Comerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 30.13%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand UMB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $138.89 which suggests that it could grow by 21.18%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Fulton Financial.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.731%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. UMB Financial offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial pays out 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are smaller than UMB Financial quarterly revenues of $363.9M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is lower than UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while UMB Financial's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 3.99x for UMB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zions Bancorp NA has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 27.02%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.38%. On the other hand Zions Bancorp NA has an analysts' consensus of $60.10 which suggests that it could grow by 11.94%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Zions Bancorp NA, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Zions Bancorp NA.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.227%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Zions Bancorp NA offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorp NA pays out 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are smaller than Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues of $792M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is lower than Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while Zions Bancorp NA's PE ratio is 12.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 2.61x for Zions Bancorp NA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.