AFRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Confluent, Inc. has a net margin of 8.65% compared to Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -22.28%. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.84% beat Confluent, Inc.'s return on equity of -29.79%.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.18%. On the other hand Confluent, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.90 which suggests that it could grow by 2.64%. Given that Affirm Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Confluent, Inc., analysts believe Affirm Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Confluent, Inc..

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Confluent, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Confluent, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Confluent, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $933.3M, which are larger than Confluent, Inc. quarterly revenues of $298.5M. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than Confluent, Inc.'s net income of -$66.5M. Notably, Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 109.72x while Confluent, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings, Inc. is 7.38x versus 9.15x for Confluent, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Core Scientific, Inc. has a net margin of 8.65% compared to Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -181.88%. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.84% beat Core Scientific, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.18%. On the other hand Core Scientific, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.77 which suggests that it could grow by 67.4%. Given that Core Scientific, Inc. has higher upside potential than Affirm Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Core Scientific, Inc. is more attractive than Affirm Holdings, Inc..

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Scientific, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Scientific, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Scientific, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $933.3M, which are larger than Core Scientific, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.1M. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than Core Scientific, Inc.'s net income of -$147.5M. Notably, Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 109.72x while Core Scientific, Inc.'s PE ratio is 114.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings, Inc. is 7.38x versus 15.62x for Core Scientific, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of 8.65% compared to Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.68%. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.84% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45%.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.18%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $293.89 which suggests that it could grow by 0.82%. Given that Affirm Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Affirm Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.088%.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Affirm Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $933.3M, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.3B. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $80.7M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 109.72x while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 34.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings, Inc. is 7.38x versus 4.22x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of 8.65% compared to Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.85%. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.84% beat Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.22%.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $92.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.18%. On the other hand Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 81.78%. Given that Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has higher upside potential than Affirm Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Pagaya Technologies Ltd. is more attractive than Affirm Holdings, Inc..

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pagaya Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Affirm Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pagaya Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Affirm Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $933.3M, which are larger than Pagaya Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $339.9M. Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $23.3M. Notably, Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 109.72x while Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Affirm Holdings, Inc. is 7.38x versus 1.48x for Pagaya Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.