AEYE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five9 has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of -1.7%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Five9's return on equity of -7.04%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.22%. On the other hand Five9 has an analysts' consensus of $52.87 which suggests that it could grow by 24.75%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Five9, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Five9.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five9 has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.19%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are smaller than Five9 quarterly revenues of $264.2M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Five9's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 6.15x versus 3.12x for Five9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of -9.14%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.22%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 118.39%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than AudioEye, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than AudioEye.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 6.15x versus 0.77x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of -6.7%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.22%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.89%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 6.15x versus 1.16x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of -13.47% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 68.1%. AudioEye's return on equity of -52.21% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 30.71%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 99.22%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $637.78 which suggests that it could grow by 28.63%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Synopsys, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Synopsys.

AudioEye has a beta of 1.001, which suggesting that the stock is 0.13000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.289%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $8.9M, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. AudioEye's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $1.1B. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Synopsys's PE ratio is 34.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 6.15x versus 12.33x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.