ABLV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Able View Global, Inc.'s net margin of 6.1%. Able View Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.14% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 79%. Given that China Automotive Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Able View Global, Inc., analysts believe China Automotive Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Able View Global, Inc..

Able View Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Able View Global, Inc. pays 0.78% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Able View Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Able View Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. Able View Global, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, Able View Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.53x while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Able View Global, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Able View Global, Inc.'s net margin of 21.15%. Able View Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.14% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.36%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $51.34 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that H World Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Able View Global, Inc., analysts believe H World Group Ltd. is more attractive than Able View Global, Inc..

Able View Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Able View Global, Inc. pays 0.78% of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Able View Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but H World Group Ltd.'s is not.

Able View Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $972.6M. Able View Global, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $205.7M. Notably, Able View Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.53x while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 28.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Able View Global, Inc. is 0.28x versus 4.47x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Able View Global, Inc.'s net margin of --. Able View Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.14% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Able View Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe Able View Global, Inc. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..

Able View Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.151%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Able View Global, Inc. pays 0.78% of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Able View Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Able View Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Able View Global, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Able View Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.53x while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Able View Global, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.03x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Able View Global, Inc.'s net margin of -13.73%. Able View Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.14% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 490.95%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Able View Global, Inc., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than Able View Global, Inc..

Able View Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.

Able View Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Able View Global, Inc. pays 0.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Able View Global, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Able View Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Able View Global, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Able View Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.53x while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Able View Global, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.57x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.