SEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avery Dennison Corp. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of 7.51%. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Avery Dennison Corp.'s return on equity of 30.81%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand Avery Dennison Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $202.82 which suggests that it could grow by 12.04%. Given that Avery Dennison Corp. has higher upside potential than Sealed Air Corp., analysts believe Avery Dennison Corp. is more attractive than Sealed Air Corp..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avery Dennison Corp. has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.204%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Avery Dennison Corp. offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Avery Dennison Corp. pays out 39.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Avery Dennison Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is higher than Avery Dennison Corp.'s net income of $166.3M. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.34x while Avery Dennison Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.14x versus 1.63x for Avery Dennison Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of 1.9%. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.62%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sealed Air Corp., analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Sealed Air Corp..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.382%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sealed Air Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $240.2M. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.34x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.14x versus 1.10x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Packaging Corporation of America has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of 9.74%. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Packaging Corporation of America's return on equity of 19.67%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand Packaging Corporation of America has an analysts' consensus of $225.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.13%. Given that Packaging Corporation of America has higher upside potential than Sealed Air Corp., analysts believe Packaging Corporation of America is more attractive than Sealed Air Corp..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Packaging Corporation of America has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.965%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Packaging Corporation of America offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corporation of America pays out 55.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Packaging Corporation of America quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is lower than Packaging Corporation of America's net income of $225.4M. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.34x while Packaging Corporation of America's PE ratio is 20.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.14x versus 2.11x for Packaging Corporation of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rollins, Inc. has a net margin of 13.74% compared to Sealed Air Corp.'s net margin of 15.94%. Sealed Air Corp.'s return on equity of 45.7% beat Rollins, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.96%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a consensus price target of $44.45, signalling upside risk potential of 7.73%. On the other hand Rollins, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.92 which suggests that it could grow by 4.54%. Given that Sealed Air Corp. has higher upside potential than Rollins, Inc., analysts believe Sealed Air Corp. is more attractive than Rollins, Inc..

Sealed Air Corp. has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.343% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rollins, Inc. has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.402%.

Sealed Air Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Rollins, Inc. offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Sealed Air Corp. pays 43.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Rollins, Inc. pays out 63.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sealed Air Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rollins, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Sealed Air Corp.'s net income of $185.7M is higher than Rollins, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M. Notably, Sealed Air Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.34x while Rollins, Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sealed Air Corp. is 1.14x versus 8.05x for Rollins, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.