IBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CoreWeave has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of --. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $293.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.36%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Business Machines Corp. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe International Business Machines Corp. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.35x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datavault AI, Inc. has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of -1135.54%. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat Datavault AI, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.56%.

International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $293.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.36%. On the other hand Datavault AI, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 208.93%. Given that Datavault AI, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Datavault AI, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datavault AI, Inc. has a beta of 0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.71%.

International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Datavault AI, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Datavault AI, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than Datavault AI, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.9M. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than Datavault AI, Inc.'s net income of -$33M. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Datavault AI, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.35x versus 10.82x for Datavault AI, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of 1.83%. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84%.

International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $293.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.36%. On the other hand Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.60 which suggests that it could grow by 38.85%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $68M. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.35x versus 0.43x for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 10.68% compared to International Business Machines Corp.'s net margin of 40.37%. International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 29.45% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.7%.

International Business Machines Corp. has a consensus price target of $293.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.36%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $184.65 which suggests that it could fall by -4.51%. Given that Palantir Technologies, Inc. has more downside risk than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe International Business Machines Corp. is more attractive than Palantir Technologies, Inc..

International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.689, which suggesting that the stock is 31.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.467%.

International Business Machines Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines Corp. pays 103.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues are $16.3B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $1.7B is higher than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $476.7M. Notably, International Business Machines Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 452.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines Corp. is 4.35x versus 126.75x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.