VG.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

37 Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net margin of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s return on equity of -93.75% beat 37 Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 37 Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has higher upside potential than 37 Capital, Inc., analysts believe Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. is more attractive than 37 Capital, Inc..

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 37 Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.248%.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 37 Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 37 Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 37 Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net income of -$307.9K is lower than 37 Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$46.9K. Notably, Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 37 Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. is -- versus -- for 37 Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net margin of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s return on equity of -93.75% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc..

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net income of -$307.9K is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net margin of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s return on equity of -93.75% beat Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.11%.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has higher upside potential than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. is more attractive than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc..

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.888%.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net income of -$307.9K is higher than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$368.6K. Notably, Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. is -- versus -- for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net margin of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s return on equity of -93.75% beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.055% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s net income of -$307.9K is higher than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volcanic Gold Mines, Inc. is -- versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.