PGZ.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 25.53%. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -92.2% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 313.79%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pan Global Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Pan Global Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -74.66%. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -92.2% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 313.79%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 233.33%. Given that Pan Global Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp., analysts believe Pan Global Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp..

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus 3.17x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 65.8%. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -92.2% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 313.79%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.02 which suggests that it could grow by 4.99%. Given that Pan Global Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Pan Global Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.865%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus 3.64x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -191.55%. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -92.2% beat Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.'s return on equity of -76.59%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 313.79%. On the other hand Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2263.64%. Given that Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pan Global Resources, Inc., analysts believe Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. is more attractive than Pan Global Resources, Inc..

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.823% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has a beta of 1.169, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.917%.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.2M. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M is higher than Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.'s net income of -$55.9M. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus 0.07x for Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.