Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
46
PGZ.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.1500
Seasonality move
:
6.23%
Day range:
$0.1400 - $0.1450
52-week range:
$0.1000 - $0.1800
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
8.70x
Volume:
563.9K
Avg. volume:
437.5K
1-year change:
3.57%
Market cap:
$48.3M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGZ.V
Pan Global Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.6000 |
|
CKG.V
Chesapeake Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$971M | $0.52 | 16.57% | 638.54% | $27.73 |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MPVD.TO
Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
$139.9M | -- | 52.25% | -- | $1.8400 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGZ.V
Pan Global Resources, Inc.
|
$0.1500 | $0.6000 | $48.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CKG.V
Chesapeake Gold Corp.
|
$4.68 | -- | $337.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$29.35 | $27.73 | $11.6B | 18.15x | $0.01 | 0.07% | 4.16x |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
$0.41 | -- | $3.4M | 0.20x | $1.80 | 0% | -- |
|
MPVD.TO
Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.
|
$0.06 | -- | $12.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.08x |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
$1.3400 | $1.8400 | $891.5M | 3.91x | $0.01 | 2.8% | 2.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGZ.V
Pan Global Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 5.437 | -- | 3.47x |
|
CKG.V
Chesapeake Gold Corp.
|
-- | 3.343 | -- | 7.11x |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
26.46% | 4.010 | 18.47% | 0.72x |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
-- | 1.131 | -- | 15.06x |
|
MPVD.TO
Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.
|
73.89% | 1.301 | 5203.04% | 0.03x |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
1.23% | 1.149 | 0.65% | 3.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGZ.V
Pan Global Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$2.1M | -101.41% | -101.41% | -- | -$1.7M |
|
CKG.V
Chesapeake Gold Corp.
|
-$4K | -$991K | -2.39% | -2.39% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
HBM.TO
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
|
$57.3M | $6.1M | 11.49% | 16.25% | 1.3% | $4.7M |
|
MON.V
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.
|
-$600 | -$306.2K | 177.22% | 178.8% | -- | -$233.9K |
|
MPVD.TO
Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.
|
-$29.9M | -$32.1M | -30.19% | -76.59% | -110.16% | -$23.2M |
|
THX.V
Thor Explorations Ltd.
|
$62.9M | $59.3M | 64.28% | 67.69% | 61.6% | $58.3M |
Pan Global Resources, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PGZ.V or CKG.V?
Chesapeake Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -101.41% beat Chesapeake Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -2.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -$0.01 $5.6M CKG.VChesapeake Gold Corp.-- -$0.03 $152.4M -
What do Analysts Say About PGZ.V or CKG.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Chesapeake Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 67.95%. Given that Pan Global Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Gold Corp., analysts believe Pan Global Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Chesapeake Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.1 0 0 CKG.VChesapeake Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is PGZ.V or CKG.V More Risky?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.445%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGZ.V or CKG.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chesapeake Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGZ.V or CKG.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chesapeake Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Chesapeake Gold Corp.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chesapeake Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Chesapeake Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.1M CKG.VChesapeake Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$1.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns PGZ.V or HBM.TO?
Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 65.8%. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -101.41% beat Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -$0.01 $5.6M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.12.31% $0.77 $5.8B -
What do Analysts Say About PGZ.V or HBM.TO?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.73 which suggests that it could fall by -5.51%. Given that Pan Global Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hudbay Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Pan Global Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Hudbay Minerals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.1 0 0 HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.10 0 0 -
Is PGZ.V or HBM.TO More Risky?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudbay Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.957, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.736%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGZ.V or HBM.TO?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc. pays out 7.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGZ.V or HBM.TO?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hudbay Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of $465.5M. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s net income of $306.3M. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudbay Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus 4.16x for Hudbay Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.1M HBM.TOHudbay Minerals, Inc.4.16x 18.15x $465.5M $306.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns PGZ.V or MON.V?
Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of --. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -101.41% beat Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s return on equity of 178.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -$0.01 $5.6M MON.VMontero Mining & Exploration Ltd.-- -$0.03 $3.5M -
What do Analysts Say About PGZ.V or MON.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 661.91%. Given that Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pan Global Resources, Inc., analysts believe Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. is more attractive than Pan Global Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.1 0 0 MON.VMontero Mining & Exploration Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PGZ.V or MON.V More Risky?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.74%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGZ.V or MON.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGZ.V or MON.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s net income of -$260.6K. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus -- for Montero Mining & Exploration Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.1M MON.VMontero Mining & Exploration Ltd.-- 0.20x -- -$260.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns PGZ.V or MPVD.TO?
Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of -191.55%. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -101.41% beat Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.'s return on equity of -76.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -$0.01 $5.6M MPVD.TOMountain Province Diamonds, Inc.-102.45% -$0.26 $597.8M -
What do Analysts Say About PGZ.V or MPVD.TO?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2066.67%. Given that Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pan Global Resources, Inc., analysts believe Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. is more attractive than Pan Global Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.1 0 0 MPVD.TOMountain Province Diamonds, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PGZ.V or MPVD.TO More Risky?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.454%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGZ.V or MPVD.TO?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGZ.V or MPVD.TO?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.2M. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is higher than Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.'s net income of -$55.9M. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus 0.08x for Mountain Province Diamonds, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.1M MPVD.TOMountain Province Diamonds, Inc.0.08x -- $29.2M -$55.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns PGZ.V or THX.V?
Thor Explorations Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net margin of 61.68%. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -101.41% beat Thor Explorations Ltd.'s return on equity of 67.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -$0.01 $5.6M THX.VThor Explorations Ltd.65.31% $0.09 $444.6M -
What do Analysts Say About PGZ.V or THX.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a consensus price target of $0.6000, signalling upside risk potential of 300%. On the other hand Thor Explorations Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $1.8400 which suggests that it could grow by 37.31%. Given that Pan Global Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Thor Explorations Ltd., analysts believe Pan Global Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Thor Explorations Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.1 0 0 THX.VThor Explorations Ltd.2 0 0 -
Is PGZ.V or THX.V More Risky?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.556, which suggesting that the stock is 55.559% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Explorations Ltd. has a beta of 1.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.017%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGZ.V or THX.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thor Explorations Ltd. offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Pan Global Resources, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Explorations Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGZ.V or THX.V?
Pan Global Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Thor Explorations Ltd. quarterly revenues of $96.2M. Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Thor Explorations Ltd.'s net income of $59.4M. Notably, Pan Global Resources, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thor Explorations Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pan Global Resources, Inc. is -- versus 2.25x for Thor Explorations Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGZ.VPan Global Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.1M THX.VThor Explorations Ltd.2.25x 3.91x $96.2M $59.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Sell
48
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 58.95% over the past day.
Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 8
Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 8.88% over the past day.
Sell
38
CRNX alert for Jan 8
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [CRNX] is up 16.08% over the past day.
