Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
36
NBY.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.11
Seasonality move
:
26.64%
Day range:
$0.11 - $0.11
52-week range:
$0.05 - $0.39
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
5.42x
Volume:
120.4K
Avg. volume:
288.2K
1-year change:
69.23%
Market cap:
$20.6M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBY.V
Niobay Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGM.V
Granada Gold Mine, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $2.75 |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBK.V
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBY.V
Niobay Metals, Inc.
|
$0.11 | -- | $20.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.22 | -- | $20.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GGM.V
Granada Gold Mine, Inc.
|
$0.06 | -- | $13.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
$1.08 | $2.75 | $137M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0250 | -- | $9.6M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TBK.V
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.
|
$0.50 | -- | $20.3M | 41.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 47.86x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBY.V
Niobay Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -2.361 | -- | 12.37x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 2.213 | -- | 2.04x |
|
GGM.V
Granada Gold Mine, Inc.
|
-11.98% | 0.094 | 18.94% | 0.01x |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
36.64% | 0.392 | 38.5% | 3.05x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -3.404 | -- | 0.06x |
|
TBK.V
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.
|
-- | 5.448 | -- | 4.87x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NBY.V
Niobay Metals, Inc.
|
-$20K | -$1.1M | -112.3% | -112.3% | -- | -$1.3M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.5M | -61.67% | -61.76% | -- | -$942.3K |
|
GGM.V
Granada Gold Mine, Inc.
|
-$1K | -$539.6K | -- | -- | -- | -$30.6K |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
-$5.4K | -$432.2K | -3.04% | -3.89% | -- | -$1.2M |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
|
TBK.V
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.
|
-$200 | -$94.4K | -1.24% | -1.24% | -- | -$165.1K |
Niobay Metals, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NBY.V or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.3% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -61.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $3M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $13.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NBY.V or BFG.CX?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2290.91%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Niobay Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Niobay Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.0 0 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is NBY.V or BFG.CX More Risky?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.965%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBY.V or BFG.CX?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niobay Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBY.V or BFG.CX?
Niobay Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$883.6K is higher than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Niobay Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niobay Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$883.6K BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns NBY.V or GGM.V?
Granada Gold Mine, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.3% beat Granada Gold Mine, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $3M GGM.VGranada Gold Mine, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$13M -
What do Analysts Say About NBY.V or GGM.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2290.91%. On the other hand Granada Gold Mine, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Niobay Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Granada Gold Mine, Inc., analysts believe Niobay Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Granada Gold Mine, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.0 0 0 GGM.VGranada Gold Mine, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NBY.V or GGM.V More Risky?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granada Gold Mine, Inc. has a beta of 2.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.864%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBY.V or GGM.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granada Gold Mine, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niobay Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granada Gold Mine, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBY.V or GGM.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Granada Gold Mine, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$883.6K is lower than Granada Gold Mine, Inc.'s net income of -$649.8K. Notably, Niobay Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Granada Gold Mine, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niobay Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Granada Gold Mine, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$883.6K GGM.VGranada Gold Mine, Inc.-- -- -- -$649.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns NBY.V or GGO.V?
Galleon Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.3% beat Galleon Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -3.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $3M GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.-- -$0.01 $42.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NBY.V or GGO.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2290.91%. On the other hand Galleon Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 154.63%. Given that Niobay Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Galleon Gold Corp., analysts believe Niobay Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Galleon Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.0 0 0 GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.1 0 0 -
Is NBY.V or GGO.V More Risky?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galleon Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.896, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.591%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBY.V or GGO.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galleon Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niobay Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galleon Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBY.V or GGO.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Galleon Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$883.6K is lower than Galleon Gold Corp.'s net income of -$800.8K. Notably, Niobay Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Galleon Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niobay Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Galleon Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$883.6K GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$800.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns NBY.V or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.3% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $3M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About NBY.V or RFR.CX?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2290.91%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 380%. Given that Niobay Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Renforth Resources, Inc., analysts believe Niobay Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Renforth Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.0 0 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NBY.V or RFR.CX More Risky?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.955%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBY.V or RFR.CX?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niobay Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBY.V or RFR.CX?
Niobay Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$883.6K is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Niobay Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niobay Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$883.6K RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns NBY.V or TBK.V?
Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.3% beat Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $3M TBK.VTrailbreaker Resources Ltd.-- -- $5.8M -
What do Analysts Say About NBY.V or TBK.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2290.91%. On the other hand Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Niobay Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd., analysts believe Niobay Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.0 0 0 TBK.VTrailbreaker Resources Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NBY.V or TBK.V More Risky?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a beta of -0.032, which suggesting that the stock is 103.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. has a beta of 2.877, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.658%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NBY.V or TBK.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Niobay Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NBY.V or TBK.V?
Niobay Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Niobay Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$883.6K is lower than Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$112.6K. Notably, Niobay Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 41.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Niobay Metals, Inc. is -- versus 47.86x for Trailbreaker Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NBY.VNiobay Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$883.6K TBK.VTrailbreaker Resources Ltd.47.86x 41.00x -- -$112.6K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.93% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 4.82% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.48% over the past day.
