MAPS.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -113.95% compared to Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -31.62%. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -5038.27% beat Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prostar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Prostar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc..

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 142.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prostar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $297.6K, which are larger than Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of -$200.9K. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$339.1K is higher than Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$563.8K. Notably, Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prostar Holdings, Inc. is 16.72x versus 44.40x for Integrated Cyber Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intermap Technologies Corp. has a net margin of -113.95% compared to Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -86.55%. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -5038.27% beat Intermap Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -19.34%.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intermap Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 115.43%. Given that Intermap Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Prostar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Intermap Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Prostar Holdings, Inc..

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 142.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intermap Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.039%.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intermap Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prostar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intermap Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $297.6K, which are smaller than Intermap Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$339.1K is higher than Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$2M. Notably, Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intermap Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 107.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prostar Holdings, Inc. is 16.72x versus 4.62x for Intermap Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellabridge Technology Corp. has a net margin of -113.95% compared to Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -34125%. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -5038.27% beat Intellabridge Technology Corp.'s return on equity of -62.88%.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intellabridge Technology Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prostar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intellabridge Technology Corp., analysts believe Prostar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Intellabridge Technology Corp..

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 142.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellabridge Technology Corp. has a beta of 1.868, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.756%.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellabridge Technology Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prostar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellabridge Technology Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $297.6K, which are larger than Intellabridge Technology Corp. quarterly revenues of $400. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$339.1K is lower than Intellabridge Technology Corp.'s net income of -$136.5K. Notably, Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellabridge Technology Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prostar Holdings, Inc. is 16.72x versus 537.54x for Intellabridge Technology Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

POSaBIT Systems Corp. has a net margin of -113.95% compared to Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -25.24%. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -5038.27% beat POSaBIT Systems Corp.'s return on equity of -462.85%.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand POSaBIT Systems Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prostar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than POSaBIT Systems Corp., analysts believe Prostar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than POSaBIT Systems Corp..

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.420, which suggesting that the stock is 142.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison POSaBIT Systems Corp. has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.208%.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. POSaBIT Systems Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prostar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. POSaBIT Systems Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prostar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $297.6K, which are smaller than POSaBIT Systems Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$339.1K is higher than POSaBIT Systems Corp.'s net income of -$821.4K. Notably, Prostar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while POSaBIT Systems Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prostar Holdings, Inc. is 16.72x versus 0.57x for POSaBIT Systems Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.