Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
31
IMP.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.74
Seasonality move
:
-7.07%
Day range:
$1.65 - $1.77
52-week range:
$1.24 - $3.55
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
107.76x
P/S ratio:
7.26x
P/B ratio:
3.68x
Volume:
62.8K
Avg. volume:
124.9K
1-year change:
-6.95%
Market cap:
$123.2M
Revenue:
$14.8M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMP.TO
Intermap Technologies Corp.
|
$5.4M | -- | -48.19% | 534.94% | $3.99 |
|
CYBE.V
CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KNR.NO
Kontrol Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCX.H.V
MCX Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NBVA.V
Nubeva Technologies Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBIT.CX
POSaBIT Systems Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMP.TO
Intermap Technologies Corp.
|
$1.74 | $3.99 | $123.2M | 107.76x | $0.00 | 0% | 7.26x |
|
CYBE.V
CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.45 | -- | $36.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 112.87x |
|
KNR.NO
Kontrol Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MCX.H.V
MCX Technologies
|
$0.03 | -- | $510.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.33x |
|
NBVA.V
Nubeva Technologies Ltd.
|
$0.15 | -- | $10.5M | 7.16x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.98x |
|
PBIT.CX
POSaBIT Systems Corp.
|
$0.05 | -- | $7.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMP.TO
Intermap Technologies Corp.
|
3.48% | -2.034 | 0.65% | 5.57x |
|
CYBE.V
CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | 7.244 | -- | 0.30x |
|
KNR.NO
Kontrol Technologies
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MCX.H.V
MCX Technologies
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NBVA.V
Nubeva Technologies Ltd.
|
0.52% | 0.825 | 0.19% | 11.37x |
|
PBIT.CX
POSaBIT Systems Corp.
|
123.77% | -0.756 | 56.06% | 2.59x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IMP.TO
Intermap Technologies Corp.
|
-$1.6M | -$1.9M | -17.43% | -19.34% | -82.06% | -$2.5M |
|
CYBE.V
CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.
|
-$1.6M | -$1.9M | -427.05% | -- | -2632.16% | -$579.4K |
|
KNR.NO
Kontrol Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCX.H.V
MCX Technologies
|
-- | -$13.6K | -- | -- | -- | -$3.3K |
|
NBVA.V
Nubeva Technologies Ltd.
|
$192K | -$202.3K | -18.87% | -18.96% | -104.49% | -$306.5K |
|
PBIT.CX
POSaBIT Systems Corp.
|
$2.6M | -$227K | -51.77% | -462.85% | -6.98% | $576.8K |
Intermap Technologies Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IMP.TO or CYBE.V?
CyberCatch Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -86.55% compared to Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net margin of -2632.16%. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -19.34% beat CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.-69.13% -$0.03 $38.8M CYBE.VCyberCatch Holdings, Inc.-2281.38% -$0.08 -$711K -
What do Analysts Say About IMP.TO or CYBE.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 129.05%. On the other hand CyberCatch Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intermap Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than CyberCatch Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Intermap Technologies Corp. is more attractive than CyberCatch Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.1 0 0 CYBE.VCyberCatch Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is IMP.TO or CYBE.V More Risky?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CyberCatch Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMP.TO or CYBE.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CyberCatch Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intermap Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CyberCatch Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMP.TO or CYBE.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are larger than CyberCatch Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $70.9K. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$2M is lower than CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Intermap Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 107.76x while CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intermap Technologies Corp. is 7.26x versus 112.87x for CyberCatch Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.7.26x 107.76x $2.4M -$2M CYBE.VCyberCatch Holdings, Inc.112.87x -- $70.9K -$1.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns IMP.TO or KNR.NO?
Kontrol Technologies has a net margin of -86.55% compared to Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net margin of --. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -19.34% beat Kontrol Technologies's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.-69.13% -$0.03 $38.8M KNR.NOKontrol Technologies-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IMP.TO or KNR.NO?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 129.05%. On the other hand Kontrol Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intermap Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Kontrol Technologies, analysts believe Intermap Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Kontrol Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.1 0 0 KNR.NOKontrol Technologies0 0 0 -
Is IMP.TO or KNR.NO More Risky?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontrol Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMP.TO or KNR.NO?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kontrol Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intermap Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kontrol Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMP.TO or KNR.NO?
Intermap Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are larger than Kontrol Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$2M is higher than Kontrol Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Intermap Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 107.76x while Kontrol Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intermap Technologies Corp. is 7.26x versus -- for Kontrol Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.7.26x 107.76x $2.4M -$2M KNR.NOKontrol Technologies-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IMP.TO or MCX.H.V?
MCX Technologies has a net margin of -86.55% compared to Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net margin of --. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -19.34% beat MCX Technologies's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.-69.13% -$0.03 $38.8M MCX.H.VMCX Technologies-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About IMP.TO or MCX.H.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 129.05%. On the other hand MCX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intermap Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than MCX Technologies, analysts believe Intermap Technologies Corp. is more attractive than MCX Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.1 0 0 MCX.H.VMCX Technologies0 0 0 -
Is IMP.TO or MCX.H.V More Risky?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MCX Technologies has a beta of 2.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.402%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMP.TO or MCX.H.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MCX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intermap Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MCX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMP.TO or MCX.H.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are larger than MCX Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$2M is lower than MCX Technologies's net income of -$13.6K. Notably, Intermap Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 107.76x while MCX Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intermap Technologies Corp. is 7.26x versus 1.33x for MCX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.7.26x 107.76x $2.4M -$2M MCX.H.VMCX Technologies1.33x -- -- -$13.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns IMP.TO or NBVA.V?
Nubeva Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -86.55% compared to Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net margin of -83.52%. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -19.34% beat Nubeva Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -18.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.-69.13% -$0.03 $38.8M NBVA.VNubeva Technologies Ltd.99.17% -$0.00 $3.8M -
What do Analysts Say About IMP.TO or NBVA.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 129.05%. On the other hand Nubeva Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intermap Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Nubeva Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Intermap Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Nubeva Technologies Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.1 0 0 NBVA.VNubeva Technologies Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is IMP.TO or NBVA.V More Risky?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nubeva Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.578%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMP.TO or NBVA.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nubeva Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intermap Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nubeva Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMP.TO or NBVA.V?
Intermap Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are larger than Nubeva Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $193.6K. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$2M is lower than Nubeva Technologies Ltd.'s net income of -$161.7K. Notably, Intermap Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 107.76x while Nubeva Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intermap Technologies Corp. is 7.26x versus 15.98x for Nubeva Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.7.26x 107.76x $2.4M -$2M NBVA.VNubeva Technologies Ltd.15.98x 7.16x $193.6K -$161.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns IMP.TO or PBIT.CX?
POSaBIT Systems Corp. has a net margin of -86.55% compared to Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net margin of -25.24%. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -19.34% beat POSaBIT Systems Corp.'s return on equity of -462.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.-69.13% -$0.03 $38.8M PBIT.CXPOSaBIT Systems Corp.81.06% -$0.01 $5.1M -
What do Analysts Say About IMP.TO or PBIT.CX?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.99, signalling upside risk potential of 129.05%. On the other hand POSaBIT Systems Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intermap Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than POSaBIT Systems Corp., analysts believe Intermap Technologies Corp. is more attractive than POSaBIT Systems Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.1 0 0 PBIT.CXPOSaBIT Systems Corp.0 0 0 -
Is IMP.TO or PBIT.CX More Risky?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison POSaBIT Systems Corp. has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.141%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IMP.TO or PBIT.CX?
Intermap Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. POSaBIT Systems Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intermap Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. POSaBIT Systems Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IMP.TO or PBIT.CX?
Intermap Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than POSaBIT Systems Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Intermap Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$2M is lower than POSaBIT Systems Corp.'s net income of -$821.4K. Notably, Intermap Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 107.76x while POSaBIT Systems Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intermap Technologies Corp. is 7.26x versus 0.46x for POSaBIT Systems Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IMP.TOIntermap Technologies Corp.7.26x 107.76x $2.4M -$2M PBIT.CXPOSaBIT Systems Corp.0.46x -- $3.3M -$821.4K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
