Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
58
LTH.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.99
Seasonality move
:
9.83%
Day range:
$0.98 - $1.02
52-week range:
$0.50 - $1.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
16.11x
Volume:
172.6K
Avg. volume:
278.8K
1-year change:
27.85%
Market cap:
$175.5M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTH.V
Lithium Ionic Corp.
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -30.56% | $3.20 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTH.V
Lithium Ionic Corp.
|
$1.01 | $3.20 | $175.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.18 | -- | $17.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
$0.10 | -- | $2.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0150 | -- | $5.8M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
$0.04 | -- | $5.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
$0.0550 | -- | $17.2M | 15.05x | $0.00 | 0% | 5,524.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTH.V
Lithium Ionic Corp.
|
1.58% | 2.164 | 0.13% | 1.90x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 1.127 | -- | 7.80x |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
101.75% | 2.514 | 6.37% | 0.81x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 1.769 | -- | 0.06x |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
-- | 0.257 | -- | 0.36x |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
7.2% | -0.184 | 10.21% | 0.25x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTH.V
Lithium Ionic Corp.
|
-$32.7K | -$1.8M | -61.47% | -- | -- | -$1.2M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -57.76% | -57.93% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
-- | -$39.3K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.9K |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
-- | -$167.9K | -87.11% | -87.11% | -- | -$66.1K |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
-$113.5K | -$490.8K | -9.58% | -10.32% | -- | -$70.6K |
Lithium Ionic Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LTH.V or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- $0.03 $11.1M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About LTH.V or BFG.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling upside risk potential of 216.83%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Ionic Corp. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Lithium Ionic Corp. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.2 0 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is LTH.V or BFG.CX More Risky?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LTH.V or BFG.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Ionic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LTH.V or BFG.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Lithium Ionic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Ionic Corp. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- -- -- $4.6M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns LTH.V or JJJ.CX?
37 Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat 37 Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- $0.03 $11.1M JJJ.CX37 Capital, Inc.-- -$0.00 $245.7K -
What do Analysts Say About LTH.V or JJJ.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling upside risk potential of 216.83%. On the other hand 37 Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Ionic Corp. has higher upside potential than 37 Capital, Inc., analysts believe Lithium Ionic Corp. is more attractive than 37 Capital, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.2 0 0 JJJ.CX37 Capital, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LTH.V or JJJ.CX More Risky?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 37 Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LTH.V or JJJ.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 37 Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Ionic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 37 Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LTH.V or JJJ.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 37 Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than 37 Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$46.9K. Notably, Lithium Ionic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 37 Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Ionic Corp. is -- versus -- for 37 Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- -- -- $4.6M JJJ.CX37 Capital, Inc.-- -- -- -$46.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns LTH.V or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- $0.03 $11.1M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About LTH.V or RFR.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling upside risk potential of 216.83%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Ionic Corp., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Ionic Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.2 0 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LTH.V or RFR.CX More Risky?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LTH.V or RFR.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Ionic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LTH.V or RFR.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Lithium Ionic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Ionic Corp. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- -- -- $4.6M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns LTH.V or SPRK.CX?
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- $0.03 $11.1M SPRK.CXSpark Energy Minerals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $3.9M -
What do Analysts Say About LTH.V or SPRK.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling upside risk potential of 216.83%. On the other hand Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Ionic Corp. has higher upside potential than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Lithium Ionic Corp. is more attractive than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.2 0 0 SPRK.CXSpark Energy Minerals, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LTH.V or SPRK.CX More Risky?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.888%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LTH.V or SPRK.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Ionic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LTH.V or SPRK.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$368.6K. Notably, Lithium Ionic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Ionic Corp. is -- versus -- for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- -- -- $4.6M SPRK.CXSpark Energy Minerals, Inc.-- -- -- -$368.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns LTH.V or SX.CX?
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- $0.03 $11.1M SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.-- -$0.00 $24.4M -
What do Analysts Say About LTH.V or SX.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a consensus price target of $3.20, signalling upside risk potential of 216.83%. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Ionic Corp. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Lithium Ionic Corp. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.2 0 0 SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is LTH.V or SX.CX More Risky?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LTH.V or SX.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Ionic Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LTH.V or SX.CX?
Lithium Ionic Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Ionic Corp.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Lithium Ionic Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Ionic Corp. is -- versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LTH.VLithium Ionic Corp.-- -- -- $4.6M SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.5,524.25x 15.05x -- -$814K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
