Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
10
GIP.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.98
Seasonality move
:
13.05%
Day range:
$2.95 - $3.04
52-week range:
$2.50 - $6.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.55x
P/B ratio:
0.86x
Volume:
4.7K
Avg. volume:
9.3K
1-year change:
-9.15%
Market cap:
$62.6M
Revenue:
$145M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.89
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIP.V
Green Impact Partners, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$0.17 | -96.43% | -32% | $5.50 |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIP.V
Green Impact Partners, Inc.
|
$2.98 | $5.50 | $62.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.55x |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
$0.0400 | -- | $8.7M | 8.00x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
$0.24 | -- | $7.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
$0.0500 | -- | $11M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.73x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
$0.07 | -- | $11.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.52x |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
$0.0100 | -- | $14.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 193.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIP.V
Green Impact Partners, Inc.
|
39.07% | -1.915 | 59.86% | 0.04x |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-104.38% | -2.334 | 17.86% | 0.15x |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
40.22% | 6.981 | 6.84% | 1.35x |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
45.95% | 0.984 | 17.7% | 0.32x |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
220.82% | 2.912 | 25.03% | 0.53x |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-16.05% | -1.522 | 11.21% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GIP.V
Green Impact Partners, Inc.
|
-$223K | -$2.4M | -14.2% | -20.57% | -14.21% | -$31K |
|
BAC.CX
BacTech Environmental Corp.
|
-- | -$438.1K | -- | -- | -- | -$374.6K |
|
DOCT.CX
Republic Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -$533.6K | -366.96% | -1749.63% | -- | -$89.8K |
|
LUX.CX
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.
|
-$58.4K | -$58.9K | -80.45% | -1082.71% | -20.88% | -$788.3K |
|
SHRC.CX
Sharc International Systems, Inc.
|
-$269K | -$713.4K | -205.85% | -2612.73% | -85.96% | -$784K |
|
SNA.CX
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.
|
-$28.8K | -$570.2K | -- | -- | -14917.02% | -$846.9K |
Green Impact Partners, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GIP.V or BAC.CX?
BacTech Environmental Corp. has a net margin of -20.06% compared to Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net margin of --. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.57% beat BacTech Environmental Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.-1.33% -$0.16 $132.2M BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.-- -$0.00 -$1.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GIP.V or BAC.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.56%. On the other hand BacTech Environmental Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Impact Partners, Inc. has higher upside potential than BacTech Environmental Corp., analysts believe Green Impact Partners, Inc. is more attractive than BacTech Environmental Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0 1 0 BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GIP.V or BAC.CX More Risky?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.81% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BacTech Environmental Corp. has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.804%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIP.V or BAC.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BacTech Environmental Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Impact Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BacTech Environmental Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIP.V or BAC.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than BacTech Environmental Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than BacTech Environmental Corp.'s net income of -$503.3K. Notably, Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BacTech Environmental Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Impact Partners, Inc. is 0.55x versus -- for BacTech Environmental Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0.55x -- $16.8M -$3.4M BAC.CXBacTech Environmental Corp.-- 8.00x -- -$503.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns GIP.V or DOCT.CX?
Republic Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -20.06% compared to Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net margin of --. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.57% beat Republic Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -1749.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.-1.33% -$0.16 $132.2M DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.-- $0.01 $3.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GIP.V or DOCT.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.56%. On the other hand Republic Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Impact Partners, Inc. has higher upside potential than Republic Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Green Impact Partners, Inc. is more attractive than Republic Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0 1 0 DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GIP.V or DOCT.CX More Risky?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.81% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.257%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIP.V or DOCT.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Impact Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIP.V or DOCT.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Republic Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Republic Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $163.7K. Notably, Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Impact Partners, Inc. is 0.55x versus -- for Republic Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0.55x -- $16.8M -$3.4M DOCT.CXRepublic Technologies, Inc.-- -- -- $163.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns GIP.V or LUX.CX?
Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a net margin of -20.06% compared to Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net margin of -106.35%. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.57% beat Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s return on equity of -1082.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.-1.33% -$0.16 $132.2M LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.-20.7% -$0.00 $5.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GIP.V or LUX.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.56%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Impact Partners, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp., analysts believe Green Impact Partners, Inc. is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0 1 0 LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GIP.V or LUX.CX More Risky?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.81% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a beta of 2.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.604%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIP.V or LUX.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Impact Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIP.V or LUX.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. quarterly revenues of $282.1K. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s net income of -$300K. Notably, Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Impact Partners, Inc. is 0.55x versus 8.73x for Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0.55x -- $16.8M -$3.4M LUX.CXNewlox Gold Ventures Corp.8.73x -- $282.1K -$300K
-
Which has Higher Returns GIP.V or SHRC.CX?
Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -20.06% compared to Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net margin of -88.58%. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.57% beat Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2612.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.-1.33% -$0.16 $132.2M SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.-32.41% -$0.00 $1.6M -
What do Analysts Say About GIP.V or SHRC.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.56%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Impact Partners, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, Inc., analysts believe Green Impact Partners, Inc. is more attractive than Sharc International Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0 1 0 SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GIP.V or SHRC.CX More Risky?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.81% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIP.V or SHRC.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sharc International Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Impact Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIP.V or SHRC.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Sharc International Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $829.9K. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$735.1K. Notably, Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Impact Partners, Inc. is 0.55x versus 4.52x for Sharc International Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0.55x -- $16.8M -$3.4M SHRC.CXSharc International Systems, Inc.4.52x -- $829.9K -$735.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns GIP.V or SNA.CX?
Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a net margin of -20.06% compared to Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net margin of -15244.79%. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.57% beat Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.-1.33% -$0.16 $132.2M SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.-1899.17% -$0.00 -$5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GIP.V or SNA.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 84.56%. On the other hand Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Impact Partners, Inc. has higher upside potential than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd., analysts believe Green Impact Partners, Inc. is more attractive than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0 1 0 SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GIP.V or SNA.CX More Risky?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.81% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.805%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GIP.V or SNA.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Impact Partners, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GIP.V or SNA.CX?
Green Impact Partners, Inc. quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M is lower than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s net income of -$586.9K. Notably, Green Impact Partners, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Impact Partners, Inc. is 0.55x versus 193.61x for Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GIP.VGreen Impact Partners, Inc.0.55x -- $16.8M -$3.4M SNA.CXStar Navigation Systems Group Ltd.193.61x -- -- -$586.9K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Buy
78
TVTX alert for Dec 27
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 1.54% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
