Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
48
CLM.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0500
Seasonality move
:
32.38%
Day range:
$0.0500 - $0.0500
52-week range:
$0.0050 - $0.0650
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
973.67x
Volume:
22K
Avg. volume:
234.4K
1-year change:
400%
Market cap:
$22.8M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLM.V
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLM.V
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.
|
$0.0500 | -- | $22.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.18 | -- | $17.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
$0.10 | -- | $2.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0150 | -- | $5.8M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
$0.04 | -- | $5.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
$0.0550 | -- | $17.2M | 15.05x | $0.00 | 0% | 5,524.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLM.V
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -0.587 | -- | 0.87x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 1.127 | -- | 7.80x |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
101.75% | 2.514 | 6.37% | 0.81x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 1.769 | -- | 0.06x |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
-- | 0.257 | -- | 0.36x |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
7.2% | -0.184 | 10.21% | 0.25x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLM.V
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$232.5K | -240.03% | -259.32% | -- | -$177.2K |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -57.76% | -57.93% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
JJJ.CX
37 Capital, Inc.
|
-- | -$39.3K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.9K |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
|
SPRK.CX
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.
|
-- | -$167.9K | -87.11% | -87.11% | -- | -$66.1K |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
-$113.5K | -$490.8K | -9.58% | -10.32% | -- | -$70.6K |
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLM.V or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -259.32% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $23.6K BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CLM.V or BFG.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.0 0 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CLM.V or BFG.CX More Risky?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.043, which suggesting that the stock is 95.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLM.V or BFG.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLM.V or BFG.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$231.8K is higher than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$231.8K BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CLM.V or JJJ.CX?
37 Capital, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -259.32% beat 37 Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $23.6K JJJ.CX37 Capital, Inc.-- -$0.00 $245.7K -
What do Analysts Say About CLM.V or JJJ.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 37 Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than 37 Capital, Inc., analysts believe Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is more attractive than 37 Capital, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.0 0 0 JJJ.CX37 Capital, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CLM.V or JJJ.CX More Risky?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.043, which suggesting that the stock is 95.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 37 Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLM.V or JJJ.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 37 Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 37 Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLM.V or JJJ.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 37 Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$231.8K is lower than 37 Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$46.9K. Notably, Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 37 Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for 37 Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$231.8K JJJ.CX37 Capital, Inc.-- -- -- -$46.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLM.V or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -259.32% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $23.6K RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About CLM.V or RFR.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.0 0 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CLM.V or RFR.CX More Risky?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.043, which suggesting that the stock is 95.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLM.V or RFR.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLM.V or RFR.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$231.8K is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$231.8K RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLM.V or SPRK.CX?
Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -259.32% beat Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $23.6K SPRK.CXSpark Energy Minerals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $3.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CLM.V or SPRK.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc., analysts believe Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.0 0 0 SPRK.CXSpark Energy Minerals, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CLM.V or SPRK.CX More Risky?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.043, which suggesting that the stock is 95.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. has a beta of 1.399, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.888%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLM.V or SPRK.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLM.V or SPRK.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$231.8K is higher than Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s net income of -$368.6K. Notably, Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is -- versus -- for Spark Energy Minerals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$231.8K SPRK.CXSpark Energy Minerals, Inc.-- -- -- -$368.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLM.V or SX.CX?
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -259.32% beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -$0.00 $23.6K SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.-- -$0.00 $24.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CLM.V or SX.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.0 0 0 SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CLM.V or SX.CX More Risky?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.043, which suggesting that the stock is 95.732% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLM.V or SX.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLM.V or SX.CX?
Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$231.8K is higher than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Consolidated Lithium Metals, Inc. is -- versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLM.VConsolidated Lithium Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$231.8K SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.5,524.25x 15.05x -- -$814K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
