APGO.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a net margin of -- compared to Apollo Silver's net margin of 25.53%. Apollo Silver's return on equity of -- beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International's return on equity of -167.71%.

Apollo Silver has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Apollo Silver has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, analysts believe Apollo Silver is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International.

Apollo Silver has a beta of 6.254, which suggesting that the stock is 525.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Apollo Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apollo Silver pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apollo Silver quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Apollo Silver's net income of -$393.1K is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International's net income of $20.9K. Notably, Apollo Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Silver is 23.32x versus 1.37x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Apollo Silver's net margin of 83.06%. Apollo Silver's return on equity of -- beat Replenish Nutrients Holding's return on equity of -1.35%.

Apollo Silver has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1025%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding has higher upside potential than Apollo Silver, analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding is more attractive than Apollo Silver.

Apollo Silver has a beta of 6.254, which suggesting that the stock is 525.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.857%.

Apollo Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apollo Silver pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apollo Silver quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Apollo Silver's net income of -$393.1K is lower than Replenish Nutrients Holding's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Apollo Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding's PE ratio is 67.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Silver is 23.32x versus 0.72x for Replenish Nutrients Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metallic Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Apollo Silver's net margin of --. Apollo Silver's return on equity of -- beat Metallic Minerals's return on equity of --.

Apollo Silver has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Metallic Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 280%. Given that Metallic Minerals has higher upside potential than Apollo Silver, analysts believe Metallic Minerals is more attractive than Apollo Silver.

Apollo Silver has a beta of 6.254, which suggesting that the stock is 525.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metallic Minerals has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.082%.

Apollo Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metallic Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apollo Silver pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metallic Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apollo Silver quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metallic Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Apollo Silver's net income of -$393.1K is higher than Metallic Minerals's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Apollo Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metallic Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Silver is 23.32x versus -- for Metallic Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standard Lithium has a net margin of -- compared to Apollo Silver's net margin of --. Apollo Silver's return on equity of -- beat Standard Lithium's return on equity of --.

Apollo Silver has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 166.67%. On the other hand Standard Lithium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.53%. Given that Apollo Silver has higher upside potential than Standard Lithium, analysts believe Apollo Silver is more attractive than Standard Lithium.

Apollo Silver has a beta of 6.254, which suggesting that the stock is 525.374% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Lithium has a beta of 1.787, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.696%.

Apollo Silver has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Lithium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apollo Silver pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Lithium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apollo Silver quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Standard Lithium quarterly revenues of --. Apollo Silver's net income of -$393.1K is higher than Standard Lithium's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Apollo Silver's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Standard Lithium's PE ratio is 2.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Silver is 23.32x versus 3,913.73x for Standard Lithium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.