Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
52
ZLSU.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$43.58
Seasonality move
:
7.89%
Day range:
$43.57 - $43.58
52-week range:
$38.09 - $45.25
Dividend yield:
1.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
930
Avg. volume:
1.7K
1-year change:
7.27%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
$44.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.03% | -- |
|
EQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF
|
$23.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.24 | 11.33% | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
$17.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 11.04% | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
$45.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 1.48% | -- |
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
$43.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.62% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.425 | -- | -- |
|
EQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF
|
-- | 0.863 | -- | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | 1.292 | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | 0.628 | -- | -- |
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.480 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ZLSU.TO
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLSA.NO
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHE.B.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZLSC.TO
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSU.TO or EQCL.TO?
Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- EQCL.TOGlobal X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSU.TO or EQCL.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is more attractive than Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF0 0 0 EQCL.TOGlobal X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSU.TO or EQCL.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSU.TO or EQCL.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF offers a yield of 11.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSU.TO or EQCL.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- -- EQCL.TOGlobal X Enhanced AllEq Asset Alloc Cov Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSU.TO or FLSA.NO?
Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- FLSA.NOFidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSU.TO or FLSA.NO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF0 0 0 FLSA.NOFidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSU.TO or FLSA.NO More Risky?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSU.TO or FLSA.NO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSU.TO or FLSA.NO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- -- FLSA.NOFidelity Long/Short Alternative ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSU.TO or HTAE.TO?
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSU.TO or HTAE.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is more attractive than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF0 0 0 HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSU.TO or HTAE.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSU.TO or HTAE.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF offers a yield of 11.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSU.TO or HTAE.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSU.TO or PHE.B.TO?
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSU.TO or PHE.B.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH, analysts believe BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is more attractive than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF0 0 0 PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH0 0 0 -
Is ZLSU.TO or PHE.B.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH has a beta of 0.371, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.854%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSU.TO or PHE.B.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSU.TO or PHE.B.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- -- PHE.B.TOPurpose Tactical Hedged Equity ETF NCH-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ZLSU.TO or ZLSC.TO?
BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net margin of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ZLSU.TO or ZLSC.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF, analysts believe BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is more attractive than BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF0 0 0 ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is ZLSU.TO or ZLSC.TO More Risky?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZLSU.TO or ZLSC.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ZLSU.TO or ZLSC.TO?
BMO Long Short US Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, BMO Long Short US Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BMO Long Short US Equity ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ZLSU.TOBMO Long Short US Equity ETF-- -- -- -- ZLSC.TOBMO Long Short Canadian Equity ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
69
NUTX alert for Dec 6
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 2.97% over the past day.
Sell
1
SYM alert for Dec 6
Symbotic, Inc. [SYM] is down 1.32% over the past day.
