Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
50
PFLS.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.87
Seasonality move
:
3.84%
Day range:
$18.78 - $19.04
52-week range:
$15.56 - $19.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
52.8K
Avg. volume:
7K
1-year change:
20.56%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNAO.U.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFMN.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
$18.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0% | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
$28.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CNAO.U.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg
|
$27.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
$17.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 9.92% | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF
|
$21.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.03% | -- |
|
PFMN.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF
|
$15.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
-- | 0.362 | -- | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
-- | 0.245 | -- | -- |
|
CNAO.U.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg
|
-- | -0.008 | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | 0.208 | -- | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF
|
-- | 0.732 | -- | -- |
|
PFMN.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF
|
-- | 0.081 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PFLS.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAG.U.TO
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNAO.U.TO
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFAE.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFMN.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLS.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net margin of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- CMAG.U.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PFLS.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has higher upside potential than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged, analysts believe Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is more attractive than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF0 0 0 CMAG.U.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged0 0 0 -
Is PFLS.TO or CMAG.U.TO More Risky?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLS.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLS.TO or CMAG.U.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged quarterly revenues of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged's net income of --. Notably, Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is -- versus -- for CI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- -- CMAG.U.TOCI Munro Alternative Global Growth ETF U$ Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLS.TO or CNAO.U.TO?
CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg has a net margin of -- compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net margin of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- CNAO.U.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PFLS.TO or CNAO.U.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has higher upside potential than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg, analysts believe Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is more attractive than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF0 0 0 CNAO.U.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg0 0 0 -
Is PFLS.TO or CNAO.U.TO More Risky?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLS.TO or CNAO.U.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLS.TO or CNAO.U.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg quarterly revenues of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg's net income of --. Notably, Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is -- versus -- for CI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- -- CNAO.U.TOCI Alternative North American Opport ETF USD Hdg-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLS.TO or HTAE.TO?
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net margin of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PFLS.TO or HTAE.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has higher upside potential than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF, analysts believe Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is more attractive than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF0 0 0 HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is PFLS.TO or HTAE.TO More Risky?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLS.TO or HTAE.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF offers a yield of 9.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLS.TO or HTAE.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is -- versus -- for Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- -- HTAE.TOHarvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLS.TO or PFAE.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net margin of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's return on equity of -- beat Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- PFAE.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PFLS.TO or PFAE.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has higher upside potential than Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF, analysts believe Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is more attractive than Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF0 0 0 PFAE.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF0 0 0 -
Is PFLS.TO or PFAE.TO More Risky?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.484%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLS.TO or PFAE.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLS.TO or PFAE.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF quarterly revenues of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net income of -- is lower than Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF's net income of --. Notably, Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is -- versus -- for Picton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- -- PFAE.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified Active Ext Alt ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PFLS.TO or PFMN.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net margin of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's return on equity of -- beat Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- PFMN.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PFLS.TO or PFMN.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has higher upside potential than Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF, analysts believe Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is more attractive than Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF0 0 0 PFMN.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF0 0 0 -
Is PFLS.TO or PFMN.TO More Risky?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF has a beta of 0.110, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PFLS.TO or PFMN.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PFLS.TO or PFMN.TO?
Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF quarterly revenues of --. Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's net income of -- is lower than Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF's net income of --. Notably, Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Picton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF is -- versus -- for Picton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PFLS.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified LS Alternative ETF-- -- -- -- PFMN.TOPicton Mahoney Fortified Mkt Neutral Alt ETF-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
