Is Shopify Stock a Good Buy Now?
eCommerce technology platform Shopify (NASDAQ:SHOP) delivered impressive returns in 2025…
Buy
60
XCLN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.00
Seasonality move
:
-2.51%
Day range:
$39.98 - $40.00
52-week range:
$25.00 - $42.28
Dividend yield:
1.38%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
515
Avg. volume:
1.5K
1-year change:
45.61%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCLN.TO
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BASE.TO
Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARS.TO
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWW.TO
iShares Global Water Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FHG.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZIN.TO
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCLN.TO
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF
|
$40.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 1.38% | -- |
|
BASE.TO
Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF
|
$26.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 8.96% | -- |
|
CARS.TO
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged
|
$27.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.87% | -- |
|
CWW.TO
iShares Global Water Index ETF
|
$66.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 1.28% | -- |
|
FHG.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF
|
$62.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.37% | -- |
|
ZIN.TO
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF
|
$50.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.18% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCLN.TO
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF
|
-- | 0.797 | -- | -- |
|
BASE.TO
Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF
|
-- | 0.807 | -- | -- |
|
CARS.TO
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | 1.730 | -- | -- |
|
CWW.TO
iShares Global Water Index ETF
|
-- | 0.452 | -- | -- |
|
FHG.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF
|
-- | 1.448 | -- | -- |
|
ZIN.TO
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF
|
-- | 0.911 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XCLN.TO
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BASE.TO
Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARS.TO
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWW.TO
iShares Global Water Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FHG.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZIN.TO
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XCLN.TO or BASE.TO?
Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- BASE.TOEvolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCLN.TO or BASE.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has higher upside potential than Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF, analysts believe iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is more attractive than Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF0 0 0 BASE.TOEvolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCLN.TO or BASE.TO More Risky?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF has a beta of 1.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.187%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCLN.TO or BASE.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF offers a yield of 8.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCLN.TO or BASE.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is -- versus -- for Evolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- -- BASE.TOEvolve Glo Mat & Mining Enhncd Yd Idx (Hedged) ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCLN.TO or CARS.TO?
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- CARS.TOEvolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCLN.TO or CARS.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has higher upside potential than Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged, analysts believe iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is more attractive than Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF0 0 0 CARS.TOEvolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged0 0 0 -
Is XCLN.TO or CARS.TO More Risky?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged has a beta of 1.526, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.643%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCLN.TO or CARS.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCLN.TO or CARS.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged quarterly revenues of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged's net income of --. Notably, iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is -- versus -- for Evolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- -- CARS.TOEvolve Automobile Innovation Index ETF Hedged-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCLN.TO or CWW.TO?
iShares Global Water Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global Water Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- CWW.TOiShares Global Water Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCLN.TO or CWW.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global Water Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global Water Index ETF, analysts believe iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Global Water Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF0 0 0 CWW.TOiShares Global Water Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCLN.TO or CWW.TO More Risky?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global Water Index ETF has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.379%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCLN.TO or CWW.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. iShares Global Water Index ETF offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global Water Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCLN.TO or CWW.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global Water Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global Water Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global Water Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global Water Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- -- CWW.TOiShares Global Water Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCLN.TO or FHG.TO?
First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- FHG.TOFirst Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCLN.TO or FHG.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF, analysts believe iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is more attractive than First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF0 0 0 FHG.TOFirst Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCLN.TO or FHG.TO More Risky?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.503%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCLN.TO or FHG.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCLN.TO or FHG.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- -- FHG.TOFirst Trust AlphaDEX™ US Industrials Sec Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XCLN.TO or ZIN.TO?
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net margin of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- ZIN.TOBMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XCLN.TO or ZIN.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF, analysts believe iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is more attractive than BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF0 0 0 ZIN.TOBMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is XCLN.TO or ZIN.TO More Risky?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.737%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XCLN.TO or ZIN.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XCLN.TO or ZIN.TO?
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XCLN.TOiShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF-- -- -- -- ZIN.TOBMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10
LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.
