VBNK.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Propel Holdings has a net margin of 20.22% compared to VersaBank's net margin of 9.67%. VersaBank's return on equity of 10.07% beat Propel Holdings's return on equity of 39.06%.

VersaBank has a consensus price target of $28.76, signalling upside risk potential of 44.07%. On the other hand Propel Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $44.64 which suggests that it could grow by 21.04%. Given that VersaBank has higher upside potential than Propel Holdings, analysts believe VersaBank is more attractive than Propel Holdings.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Propel Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VersaBank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Propel Holdings offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. VersaBank pays 9.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Propel Holdings pays out 36.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VersaBank quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Propel Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.5M. VersaBank's net income of $5.5M is lower than Propel Holdings's net income of $14.4M. Notably, VersaBank's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Propel Holdings's PE ratio is 23.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VersaBank is 4.59x versus 2.58x for Propel Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quinsam Capital has a net margin of 20.22% compared to VersaBank's net margin of -234.02%. VersaBank's return on equity of 10.07% beat Quinsam Capital's return on equity of -2.62%.

VersaBank has a consensus price target of $28.76, signalling upside risk potential of 44.07%. On the other hand Quinsam Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VersaBank has higher upside potential than Quinsam Capital, analysts believe VersaBank is more attractive than Quinsam Capital.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quinsam Capital has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.197%.

VersaBank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Quinsam Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VersaBank pays 9.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Quinsam Capital pays out -6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. VersaBank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VersaBank quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are larger than Quinsam Capital quarterly revenues of -$517.6K. VersaBank's net income of $5.5M is higher than Quinsam Capital's net income of $1.2M. Notably, VersaBank's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Quinsam Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VersaBank is 4.59x versus -- for Quinsam Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tiny has a net margin of 20.22% compared to VersaBank's net margin of -20.92%. VersaBank's return on equity of 10.07% beat Tiny's return on equity of -15%.

VersaBank has a consensus price target of $28.76, signalling upside risk potential of 44.07%. On the other hand Tiny has an analysts' consensus of $1.83 which suggests that it could grow by 10.92%. Given that VersaBank has higher upside potential than Tiny, analysts believe VersaBank is more attractive than Tiny.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiny has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.981%.

VersaBank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Tiny offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VersaBank pays 9.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiny pays out 64.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VersaBank quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Tiny quarterly revenues of $46.7M. VersaBank's net income of $5.5M is higher than Tiny's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, VersaBank's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Tiny's PE ratio is 68.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VersaBank is 4.59x versus 1.31x for Tiny. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trisura Group has a net margin of 20.22% compared to VersaBank's net margin of 4.72%. VersaBank's return on equity of 10.07% beat Trisura Group's return on equity of 14.01%.

VersaBank has a consensus price target of $28.76, signalling upside risk potential of 44.07%. On the other hand Trisura Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.78 which suggests that it could grow by 53%. Given that Trisura Group has higher upside potential than VersaBank, analysts believe Trisura Group is more attractive than VersaBank.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trisura Group has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.351%.

VersaBank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Trisura Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VersaBank pays 9.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Trisura Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. VersaBank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VersaBank quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Trisura Group quarterly revenues of $765.4M. VersaBank's net income of $5.5M is lower than Trisura Group's net income of $36.1M. Notably, VersaBank's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Trisura Group's PE ratio is 20.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VersaBank is 4.59x versus 0.82x for Trisura Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.