PRL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Findev, Inc. has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 65.32%. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.22% beat Findev, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.85%.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.37, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand Findev, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Propel Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Findev, Inc., analysts believe Propel Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Findev, Inc..

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Findev, Inc. has a beta of 0.684, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.586%.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Findev, Inc. offers a yield of 7.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Propel Holdings, Inc. pays 29.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Findev, Inc. pays out 33.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Propel Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are larger than Findev, Inc. quarterly revenues of $272.2K. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $20.7M is higher than Findev, Inc.'s net income of $177.8K. Notably, Propel Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Findev, Inc.'s PE ratio is 50.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Propel Holdings, Inc. is 1.34x versus 28.58x for Findev, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fineqia International, Inc. has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -340.38%. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.22% beat Fineqia International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.37, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand Fineqia International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Propel Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fineqia International, Inc., analysts believe Propel Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Fineqia International, Inc..

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fineqia International, Inc. has a beta of 1.809, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.905%.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Fineqia International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Propel Holdings, Inc. pays 29.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Fineqia International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Propel Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are larger than Fineqia International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $148.1K. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $20.7M is higher than Fineqia International, Inc.'s net income of -$504.1K. Notably, Propel Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Fineqia International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Propel Holdings, Inc. is 1.34x versus 8.01x for Fineqia International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

goeasy Ltd. has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.52%. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.22% beat goeasy Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.44%.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.37, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand goeasy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $203.40 which suggests that it could grow by 54.97%. Given that goeasy Ltd. has higher upside potential than Propel Holdings, Inc., analysts believe goeasy Ltd. is more attractive than Propel Holdings, Inc..

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison goeasy Ltd. has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.641%.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. goeasy Ltd. offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. Propel Holdings, Inc. pays 29.84% of its earnings as a dividend. goeasy Ltd. pays out 28.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Propel Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are smaller than goeasy Ltd. quarterly revenues of $440.2M. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $20.7M is lower than goeasy Ltd.'s net income of $33.1M. Notably, Propel Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while goeasy Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Propel Holdings, Inc. is 1.34x versus 1.34x for goeasy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a net margin of 9.87% compared to Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.22% beat New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.37, signalling upside risk potential of 44.09%. On the other hand New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Propel Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Frontier Ventures, Inc., analysts believe Propel Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than New Frontier Ventures, Inc..

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Frontier Ventures, Inc. has a beta of -0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.578%.

Propel Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Propel Holdings, Inc. pays 29.84% of its earnings as a dividend. New Frontier Ventures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Propel Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $209.4M, which are larger than New Frontier Ventures, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Propel Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $20.7M is higher than New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s net income of -$10.5K. Notably, Propel Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while New Frontier Ventures, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Propel Holdings, Inc. is 1.34x versus 29.93x for New Frontier Ventures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.