Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
71
SKE.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.89
Seasonality move
:
22.67%
Day range:
$33.53 - $35.46
52-week range:
$12.15 - $35.73
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
48.13x
Volume:
420.4K
Avg. volume:
367.2K
1-year change:
159.69%
Market cap:
$4.1B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$1.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE.TO
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.06 | -- | -97.92% | $35.13 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FVL.TO
Freegold Ventures Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $3.90 |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TLG.TO
Troilus Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $3.31 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE.TO
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
$33.89 | $35.13 | $4.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.24 | -- | $22.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FVL.TO
Freegold Ventures Ltd.
|
$1.46 | $3.90 | $778M | 1,129.03x | $0.00 | 0% | 4,615.63x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0150 | -- | $5.8M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TLG.TO
Troilus Gold Corp.
|
$1.53 | $3.31 | $836.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE.TO
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
41.99% | 2.470 | 2.09% | 1.93x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 1.127 | -- | 7.80x |
|
FVL.TO
Freegold Ventures Ltd.
|
0.03% | 2.529 | 0.01% | 15.28x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 1.769 | -- | 0.06x |
|
TLG.TO
Troilus Gold Corp.
|
76.09% | 2.560 | 3.89% | 0.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKE.TO
Skeena Resources Ltd.
|
-$418K | -$15M | -86.93% | -112.49% | -- | -$110.3M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -57.76% | -57.93% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
FVL.TO
Freegold Ventures Ltd.
|
-$32.4K | -$430.5K | -0.62% | -0.62% | -- | -$9.1M |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
|
TLG.TO
Troilus Gold Corp.
|
-$364.8K | -$17.5M | -157.43% | -228.26% | -- | -$17.1M |
Skeena Resources Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE.TO or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.49% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.32 $147M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SKE.TO or BFG.CX?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skeena Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Skeena Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.7 1 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SKE.TO or BFG.CX More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.813% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE.TO or BFG.CX?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE.TO or BFG.CX?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$36.8M is lower than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$36.8M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE.TO or FVL.TO?
Freegold Ventures Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.49% beat Freegold Ventures Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.32 $147M FVL.TOFreegold Ventures Ltd.-- -$0.00 $187.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SKE.TO or FVL.TO?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Freegold Ventures Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $3.90 which suggests that it could grow by 167.12%. Given that Freegold Ventures Ltd. has higher upside potential than Skeena Resources Ltd., analysts believe Freegold Ventures Ltd. is more attractive than Skeena Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.7 1 0 FVL.TOFreegold Ventures Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SKE.TO or FVL.TO More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.813% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freegold Ventures Ltd. has a beta of 1.645, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.519%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE.TO or FVL.TO?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freegold Ventures Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freegold Ventures Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE.TO or FVL.TO?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Freegold Ventures Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$36.8M is lower than Freegold Ventures Ltd.'s net income of -$161.7K. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Freegold Ventures Ltd.'s PE ratio is 1,129.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus 4,615.63x for Freegold Ventures Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$36.8M FVL.TOFreegold Ventures Ltd.4,615.63x 1,129.03x -- -$161.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE.TO or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.49% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.32 $147M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About SKE.TO or RFR.CX?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Skeena Resources Ltd., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Skeena Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.7 1 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SKE.TO or RFR.CX More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.813% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE.TO or RFR.CX?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE.TO or RFR.CX?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$36.8M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$36.8M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns SKE.TO or TLG.TO?
Troilus Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net margin of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.49% beat Troilus Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -228.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -$0.32 $147M TLG.TOTroilus Gold Corp.-- -$0.04 $29.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SKE.TO or TLG.TO?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a consensus price target of $35.13, signalling downside risk potential of -0.19%. On the other hand Troilus Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.31 which suggests that it could grow by 116.5%. Given that Troilus Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Skeena Resources Ltd., analysts believe Troilus Gold Corp. is more attractive than Skeena Resources Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.7 1 0 TLG.TOTroilus Gold Corp.3 0 0 -
Is SKE.TO or TLG.TO More Risky?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.813% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Troilus Gold Corp. has a beta of 2.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.168%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKE.TO or TLG.TO?
Skeena Resources Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Troilus Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skeena Resources Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Troilus Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKE.TO or TLG.TO?
Skeena Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Troilus Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Skeena Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$36.8M is lower than Troilus Gold Corp.'s net income of -$14.9M. Notably, Skeena Resources Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Troilus Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skeena Resources Ltd. is -- versus -- for Troilus Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKE.TOSkeena Resources Ltd.-- -- -- -$36.8M TLG.TOTroilus Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$14.9M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
37
OKLO alert for Dec 16
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
Sell
43
SEI alert for Dec 16
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. [SEI] is down 5.3% over the past day.
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 21.85% over the past day.
