Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
26
PBL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.93
Seasonality move
:
8.64%
Day range:
$18.90 - $19.51
52-week range:
$17.19 - $29.89
Dividend yield:
1.04%
P/E ratio:
18.77x
P/S ratio:
0.90x
P/B ratio:
1.40x
Volume:
9.1K
Avg. volume:
34.7K
1-year change:
-19.15%
Market cap:
$521.1M
Revenue:
$557.1M
EPS (TTM):
$1.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBL.TO
Pollard Banknote Ltd.
|
$162.5M | $0.52 | 5.88% | -21.43% | $32.75 |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JKPT.CX
Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TUGA.CX
TUGA Innovations, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBL.TO
Pollard Banknote Ltd.
|
$19.25 | $32.75 | $521.1M | 18.77x | $0.05 | 1.04% | 0.90x |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
$0.05 | -- | $3.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $684.4K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 22.25x |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
$0.02 | -- | $104.8K | 0.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
JKPT.CX
Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.
|
$0.03 | -- | $1.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.32x |
|
TUGA.CX
TUGA Innovations, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $495.9K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBL.TO
Pollard Banknote Ltd.
|
34.34% | 2.280 | 31.46% | 1.23x |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
339.18% | -2.753 | 7.73% | 0.22x |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
9.79% | 0.591 | 5.74% | 0.42x |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
-99.31% | 3.442 | 2177.41% | 0.02x |
|
JKPT.CX
Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TUGA.CX
TUGA Innovations, Inc.
|
-- | -0.957 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBL.TO
Pollard Banknote Ltd.
|
$28.1M | $2.4M | 5.26% | 8.14% | 1.54% | $21.2M |
|
ATHR.CX
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.
|
-$9.2K | -$407.1K | -1167.62% | -- | -- | -$171.2K |
|
CCR.CX
Green River Gold Corp.
|
-- | -$121.1K | -27.26% | -30.22% | -1719.46% | -$113.6K |
|
JIVA.CX
JIVA Technologies, Inc.
|
$259.1K | -$75.8K | -- | -- | -5.86% | $126.8K |
|
JKPT.CX
Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TUGA.CX
TUGA Innovations, Inc.
|
-- | -$213.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$43.3K |
Pollard Banknote Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PBL.TO or ATHR.CX?
Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.14% beat Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.17.96% $0.37 $566.4M ATHR.CXAether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.-- -$0.01 $128.9K -
What do Analysts Say About PBL.TO or ATHR.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 79.22%. On the other hand Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote Ltd. has higher upside potential than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Pollard Banknote Ltd. is more attractive than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.2 0 0 ATHR.CXAether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PBL.TO or ATHR.CX More Risky?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.022%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBL.TO or ATHR.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote Ltd. pays 15.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBL.TO or ATHR.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. quarterly revenues are $156.3M, which are larger than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net income of $10.3M is higher than Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$413.5K. Notably, Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote Ltd. is 0.90x versus -- for Aether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.0.90x 18.77x $156.3M $10.3M ATHR.CXAether Catalyst Solutions, Inc.-- -- -- -$413.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns PBL.TO or CCR.CX?
Green River Gold Corp. has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net margin of -1812.76%. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.14% beat Green River Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -30.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.17.96% $0.37 $566.4M CCR.CXGreen River Gold Corp.-- -$0.00 $3M -
What do Analysts Say About PBL.TO or CCR.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 79.22%. On the other hand Green River Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote Ltd. has higher upside potential than Green River Gold Corp., analysts believe Pollard Banknote Ltd. is more attractive than Green River Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.2 0 0 CCR.CXGreen River Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is PBL.TO or CCR.CX More Risky?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green River Gold Corp. has a beta of -1.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 223.099%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBL.TO or CCR.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Green River Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote Ltd. pays 15.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Green River Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBL.TO or CCR.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. quarterly revenues are $156.3M, which are larger than Green River Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $10K. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net income of $10.3M is higher than Green River Gold Corp.'s net income of -$129K. Notably, Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while Green River Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote Ltd. is 0.90x versus 22.25x for Green River Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.0.90x 18.77x $156.3M $10.3M CCR.CXGreen River Gold Corp.22.25x -- $10K -$129K
-
Which has Higher Returns PBL.TO or JIVA.CX?
JIVA Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net margin of -20.27%. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.14% beat JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.17.96% $0.37 $566.4M JIVA.CXJIVA Technologies, Inc.20.01% -$0.06 -$6.3M -
What do Analysts Say About PBL.TO or JIVA.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 79.22%. On the other hand JIVA Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote Ltd. has higher upside potential than JIVA Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Pollard Banknote Ltd. is more attractive than JIVA Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.2 0 0 JIVA.CXJIVA Technologies, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PBL.TO or JIVA.CX More Risky?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JIVA Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.82%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBL.TO or JIVA.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. JIVA Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote Ltd. pays 15.36% of its earnings as a dividend. JIVA Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBL.TO or JIVA.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. quarterly revenues are $156.3M, which are larger than JIVA Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net income of $10.3M is higher than JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$262.4K. Notably, Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while JIVA Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote Ltd. is 0.90x versus 0.01x for JIVA Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.0.90x 18.77x $156.3M $10.3M JIVA.CXJIVA Technologies, Inc.0.01x 0.50x $1.3M -$262.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns PBL.TO or JKPT.CX?
Kings Entertainment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.14% beat Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.17.96% $0.37 $566.4M JKPT.CXKings Entertainment Group, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBL.TO or JKPT.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 79.22%. On the other hand Kings Entertainment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kings Entertainment Group, Inc., analysts believe Pollard Banknote Ltd. is more attractive than Kings Entertainment Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.2 0 0 JKPT.CXKings Entertainment Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PBL.TO or JKPT.CX More Risky?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kings Entertainment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBL.TO or JKPT.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Kings Entertainment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote Ltd. pays 15.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Kings Entertainment Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBL.TO or JKPT.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. quarterly revenues are $156.3M, which are larger than Kings Entertainment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net income of $10.3M is higher than Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote Ltd. is 0.90x versus 0.32x for Kings Entertainment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.0.90x 18.77x $156.3M $10.3M JKPT.CXKings Entertainment Group, Inc.0.32x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBL.TO or TUGA.CX?
TUGA Innovations, Inc. has a net margin of 6.59% compared to Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.14% beat TUGA Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.17.96% $0.37 $566.4M TUGA.CXTUGA Innovations, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBL.TO or TUGA.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a consensus price target of $32.75, signalling upside risk potential of 79.22%. On the other hand TUGA Innovations, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote Ltd. has higher upside potential than TUGA Innovations, Inc., analysts believe Pollard Banknote Ltd. is more attractive than TUGA Innovations, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.2 0 0 TUGA.CXTUGA Innovations, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PBL.TO or TUGA.CX More Risky?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a beta of 1.046, which suggesting that the stock is 4.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TUGA Innovations, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBL.TO or TUGA.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. TUGA Innovations, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote Ltd. pays 15.36% of its earnings as a dividend. TUGA Innovations, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBL.TO or TUGA.CX?
Pollard Banknote Ltd. quarterly revenues are $156.3M, which are larger than TUGA Innovations, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s net income of $10.3M is higher than TUGA Innovations, Inc.'s net income of -$185.3K. Notably, Pollard Banknote Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.77x while TUGA Innovations, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote Ltd. is 0.90x versus -- for TUGA Innovations, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBL.TOPollard Banknote Ltd.0.90x 18.77x $156.3M $10.3M TUGA.CXTUGA Innovations, Inc.-- -- -- -$185.3K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
67
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
46
BE alert for Dec 18
Bloom Energy Corp. [BE] is up 4.27% over the past day.
Sell
44
STRL alert for Dec 18
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. [STRL] is up 6.62% over the past day.
Sell
39
SOXL alert for Dec 18
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 7.28% over the past day.
