PBL.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Green River Gold has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Pollard Banknote's net margin of -1812.76%. Pollard Banknote's return on equity of 16.33% beat Green River Gold's return on equity of -30.22%.

Pollard Banknote has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.39%. On the other hand Green River Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote has higher upside potential than Green River Gold, analysts believe Pollard Banknote is more attractive than Green River Gold.

Pollard Banknote has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green River Gold has a beta of -1.462, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 246.191%.

Pollard Banknote has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Green River Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote pays 13.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Green River Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pollard Banknote quarterly revenues are $153.3M, which are larger than Green River Gold quarterly revenues of $10K. Pollard Banknote's net income of $18.2M is higher than Green River Gold's net income of -$129K. Notably, Pollard Banknote's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Green River Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote is 1.20x versus -- for Green River Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JIVA Technologies has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Pollard Banknote's net margin of -67.13%. Pollard Banknote's return on equity of 16.33% beat JIVA Technologies's return on equity of --.

Pollard Banknote has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.39%. On the other hand JIVA Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote has higher upside potential than JIVA Technologies, analysts believe Pollard Banknote is more attractive than JIVA Technologies.

Pollard Banknote has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JIVA Technologies has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.639%.

Pollard Banknote has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. JIVA Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote pays 13.72% of its earnings as a dividend. JIVA Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pollard Banknote quarterly revenues are $153.3M, which are larger than JIVA Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Pollard Banknote's net income of $18.2M is higher than JIVA Technologies's net income of -$988.3K. Notably, Pollard Banknote's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while JIVA Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote is 1.20x versus 0.04x for JIVA Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nextech3d AI has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Pollard Banknote's net margin of -173.71%. Pollard Banknote's return on equity of 16.33% beat Nextech3d AI's return on equity of -839.86%.

Pollard Banknote has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.39%. On the other hand Nextech3d AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote has higher upside potential than Nextech3d AI, analysts believe Pollard Banknote is more attractive than Nextech3d AI.

Pollard Banknote has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nextech3d AI has a beta of 1.539, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.923%.

Pollard Banknote has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Nextech3d AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote pays 13.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Nextech3d AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pollard Banknote quarterly revenues are $153.3M, which are larger than Nextech3d AI quarterly revenues of $756.5K. Pollard Banknote's net income of $18.2M is higher than Nextech3d AI's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Pollard Banknote's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Nextech3d AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote is 1.20x versus 2.29x for Nextech3d AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuga Innovations has a net margin of 11.85% compared to Pollard Banknote's net margin of --. Pollard Banknote's return on equity of 16.33% beat Tuga Innovations's return on equity of --.

Pollard Banknote has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 68.39%. On the other hand Tuga Innovations has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pollard Banknote has higher upside potential than Tuga Innovations, analysts believe Pollard Banknote is more attractive than Tuga Innovations.

Pollard Banknote has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.489% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuga Innovations has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pollard Banknote has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Tuga Innovations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pollard Banknote pays 13.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Tuga Innovations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pollard Banknote's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pollard Banknote quarterly revenues are $153.3M, which are larger than Tuga Innovations quarterly revenues of --. Pollard Banknote's net income of $18.2M is higher than Tuga Innovations's net income of -$122.6K. Notably, Pollard Banknote's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.67x while Tuga Innovations's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pollard Banknote is 1.20x versus -- for Tuga Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.