Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
50
MNY.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$100.18
Seasonality move
:
-0.09%
Day range:
$100.16 - $100.18
52-week range:
$100.00 - $100.31
Dividend yield:
3.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
33.7K
Avg. volume:
21.2K
1-year change:
-0.07%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF
|
$100.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 3.03% | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
$50.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 2.6% | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
$50.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.93% | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
$50.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.64% | -- |
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
$116.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
$50.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 2.7% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF
|
-- | -0.005 | -- | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -0.009 | -- | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
-- | -0.010 | -- | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -0.003 | -- | -- |
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
-- | 0.057 | -- | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -0.002 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MNY.TO or CASH.TO?
Global X High Interest Savings ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X High Interest Savings ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- CASH.TOGlobal X High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MNY.TO or CASH.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X High Interest Savings ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Global X High Interest Savings ETF, analysts believe Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is more attractive than Global X High Interest Savings ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF0 0 0 CASH.TOGlobal X High Interest Savings ETF0 0 0 -
Is MNY.TO or CASH.TO More Risky?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X High Interest Savings ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNY.TO or CASH.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Global X High Interest Savings ETF offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X High Interest Savings ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNY.TO or CASH.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X High Interest Savings ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X High Interest Savings ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X High Interest Savings ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Global X High Interest Savings ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- -- CASH.TOGlobal X High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MNY.TO or CMR.TO?
iShares Premium Money Market ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Premium Money Market ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- CMR.TOiShares Premium Money Market ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MNY.TO or CMR.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Premium Money Market ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Premium Money Market ETF, analysts believe Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is more attractive than iShares Premium Money Market ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF0 0 0 CMR.TOiShares Premium Money Market ETF0 0 0 -
Is MNY.TO or CMR.TO More Risky?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Premium Money Market ETF has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.181%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNY.TO or CMR.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. iShares Premium Money Market ETF offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Premium Money Market ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNY.TO or CMR.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Premium Money Market ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Premium Money Market ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Premium Money Market ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Premium Money Market ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- -- CMR.TOiShares Premium Money Market ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MNY.TO or CSAV.TO?
CI High Interest Savings ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI High Interest Savings ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- CSAV.TOCI High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MNY.TO or CSAV.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI High Interest Savings ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has higher upside potential than CI High Interest Savings ETF, analysts believe Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is more attractive than CI High Interest Savings ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF0 0 0 CSAV.TOCI High Interest Savings ETF0 0 0 -
Is MNY.TO or CSAV.TO More Risky?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI High Interest Savings ETF has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.2%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNY.TO or CSAV.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. CI High Interest Savings ETF offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI High Interest Savings ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNY.TO or CSAV.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI High Interest Savings ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI High Interest Savings ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI High Interest Savings ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is -- versus -- for CI High Interest Savings ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- -- CSAV.TOCI High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MNY.TO or HSAV.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MNY.TO or HSAV.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF, analysts believe Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is more attractive than Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF0 0 0 HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF0 0 0 -
Is MNY.TO or HSAV.TO More Risky?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.064%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNY.TO or HSAV.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNY.TO or HSAV.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- -- HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MNY.TO or PSA.TO?
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net margin of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose High Interest Savings ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- PSA.TOPurpose High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MNY.TO or PSA.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose High Interest Savings ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF, analysts believe Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is more attractive than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF0 0 0 PSA.TOPurpose High Interest Savings ETF0 0 0 -
Is MNY.TO or PSA.TO More Risky?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose High Interest Savings ETF has a beta of -0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.318%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNY.TO or PSA.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Purpose High Interest Savings ETF offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose High Interest Savings ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNY.TO or PSA.TO?
Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF quarterly revenues of --. Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF's net income of --. Notably, Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose High Interest Savings ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Purpose Cash Management Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose High Interest Savings ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNY.TOPurpose Cash Management Fund ETF-- -- -- -- PSA.TOPurpose High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
35
SMX alert for Dec 19
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 11.91% over the past day.
Sell
36
INSP alert for Dec 19
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. [INSP] is up 1.39% over the past day.
Sell
40
INSM alert for Dec 19
Insmed, Inc. [INSM] is up 4.79% over the past day.
