Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
29
HSAV.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$116.53
Seasonality move
:
0.59%
Day range:
$116.57 - $116.69
52-week range:
$113.81 - $116.72
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
32.2K
Avg. volume:
34.8K
1-year change:
2.46%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIL.TO
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
$116.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
$50.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 2.61% | -- |
|
CBIL.TO
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF
|
$50.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 2.62% | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
$50.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.94% | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
$50.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 2.65% | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
$50.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 2.7% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
-- | 0.057 | -- | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -0.009 | -- | -- |
|
CBIL.TO
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF
|
-- | -0.004 | -- | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
-- | -0.010 | -- | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -0.003 | -- | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -0.002 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBIL.TO
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMR.TO
iShares Premium Money Market ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HSAV.TO or CASH.TO?
Global X High Interest Savings ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net margin of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X High Interest Savings ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- CASH.TOGlobal X High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HSAV.TO or CASH.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X High Interest Savings ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has higher upside potential than Global X High Interest Savings ETF, analysts believe Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is more attractive than Global X High Interest Savings ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF0 0 0 CASH.TOGlobal X High Interest Savings ETF0 0 0 -
Is HSAV.TO or CASH.TO More Risky?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X High Interest Savings ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HSAV.TO or CASH.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X High Interest Savings ETF offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X High Interest Savings ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HSAV.TO or CASH.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X High Interest Savings ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X High Interest Savings ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X High Interest Savings ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is -- versus -- for Global X High Interest Savings ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- -- CASH.TOGlobal X High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HSAV.TO or CBIL.TO?
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net margin of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- CBIL.TOGlobal X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HSAV.TO or CBIL.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has higher upside potential than Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF, analysts believe Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is more attractive than Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF0 0 0 CBIL.TOGlobal X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF0 0 0 -
Is HSAV.TO or CBIL.TO More Risky?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HSAV.TO or CBIL.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HSAV.TO or CBIL.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is -- versus -- for Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- -- CBIL.TOGlobal X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HSAV.TO or CMR.TO?
iShares Premium Money Market ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net margin of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Premium Money Market ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- CMR.TOiShares Premium Money Market ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HSAV.TO or CMR.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Premium Money Market ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Premium Money Market ETF, analysts believe Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is more attractive than iShares Premium Money Market ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF0 0 0 CMR.TOiShares Premium Money Market ETF0 0 0 -
Is HSAV.TO or CMR.TO More Risky?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Premium Money Market ETF has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.181%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HSAV.TO or CMR.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares Premium Money Market ETF offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Premium Money Market ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HSAV.TO or CMR.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Premium Money Market ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Premium Money Market ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Premium Money Market ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Premium Money Market ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- -- CMR.TOiShares Premium Money Market ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HSAV.TO or CSAV.TO?
CI High Interest Savings ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net margin of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI High Interest Savings ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- CSAV.TOCI High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HSAV.TO or CSAV.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI High Interest Savings ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has higher upside potential than CI High Interest Savings ETF, analysts believe Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is more attractive than CI High Interest Savings ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF0 0 0 CSAV.TOCI High Interest Savings ETF0 0 0 -
Is HSAV.TO or CSAV.TO More Risky?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI High Interest Savings ETF has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.2%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HSAV.TO or CSAV.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CI High Interest Savings ETF offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI High Interest Savings ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HSAV.TO or CSAV.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI High Interest Savings ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI High Interest Savings ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI High Interest Savings ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is -- versus -- for CI High Interest Savings ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- -- CSAV.TOCI High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HSAV.TO or PSA.TO?
Purpose High Interest Savings ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net margin of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's return on equity of -- beat Purpose High Interest Savings ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- PSA.TOPurpose High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HSAV.TO or PSA.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purpose High Interest Savings ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has higher upside potential than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF, analysts believe Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is more attractive than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF0 0 0 PSA.TOPurpose High Interest Savings ETF0 0 0 -
Is HSAV.TO or PSA.TO More Risky?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a beta of 0.009, which suggesting that the stock is 99.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purpose High Interest Savings ETF has a beta of -0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.318%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HSAV.TO or PSA.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Purpose High Interest Savings ETF offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purpose High Interest Savings ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HSAV.TO or PSA.TO?
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's net income of -- is lower than Purpose High Interest Savings ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purpose High Interest Savings ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF is -- versus -- for Purpose High Interest Savings ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HSAV.TOGlobal X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF-- -- -- -- PSA.TOPurpose High Interest Savings ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 28.81% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 43.66% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.97% over the past day.
