Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
43
MKZ.UN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.48
Seasonality move
:
1.71%
Day range:
$0.48 - $0.48
52-week range:
$0.38 - $0.62
Dividend yield:
14.95%
P/E ratio:
6.70x
P/S ratio:
3.83x
P/B ratio:
1.03x
Volume:
6K
Avg. volume:
8.1K
1-year change:
15.66%
Market cap:
$3M
Revenue:
$778K
EPS (TTM):
$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKZ.UN.TO
Mackenzie Master LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVG.TO
Clairvest Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNQ.CX
Fineqia International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGM.TO
IGM Financial, Inc.
|
$973.9M | $1.18 | 11.29% | 19.76% | $69.75 |
|
SII.TO
Sprott, Inc.
|
$112.3M | $1.50 | 77.44% | 117.81% | $196.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKZ.UN.TO
Mackenzie Master LP
|
$0.48 | -- | $3M | 6.70x | $0.07 | 14.95% | 3.83x |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International, Inc.
|
$0.03 | -- | $3.3M | -- | $0.00 | 96% | -- |
|
CVG.TO
Clairvest Group, Inc.
|
$75.00 | -- | $1B | 14.27x | $0.88 | 0.14% | 11.03x |
|
FNQ.CX
Fineqia International, Inc.
|
$0.0050 | -- | $8.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.01x |
|
IGM.TO
IGM Financial, Inc.
|
$67.06 | $69.75 | $15.7B | 14.43x | $0.62 | 3.45% | 4.44x |
|
SII.TO
Sprott, Inc.
|
$195.59 | $196.00 | $4.8B | 51.51x | $0.55 | 1.03% | 11.98x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKZ.UN.TO
Mackenzie Master LP
|
-- | 0.275 | -- | 3.16x |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International, Inc.
|
3.89% | -2.084 | 0.91% | 0.92x |
|
CVG.TO
Clairvest Group, Inc.
|
-- | -0.578 | -- | 2.79x |
|
FNQ.CX
Fineqia International, Inc.
|
-153.33% | 0.000 | 27.17% | 0.00x |
|
IGM.TO
IGM Financial, Inc.
|
45.21% | 0.218 | 51.36% | 0.20x |
|
SII.TO
Sprott, Inc.
|
-- | 2.468 | -- | 1.27x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKZ.UN.TO
Mackenzie Master LP
|
-- | -- | 153.35% | 153.35% | -- | -- |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International, Inc.
|
-$1.5M | $737K | -315.42% | -319.37% | -48.04% | -$762.2K |
|
CVG.TO
Clairvest Group, Inc.
|
-- | $121.6M | 5.72% | 5.72% | 331.1% | $56.2M |
|
FNQ.CX
Fineqia International, Inc.
|
$144.9K | $116.7K | -11905.51% | -- | 78.8% | -$462.9K |
|
IGM.TO
IGM Financial, Inc.
|
$586.8M | $391.8M | 6.96% | 13.17% | 40.26% | $310.4M |
|
SII.TO
Sprott, Inc.
|
$148.3M | $55.7M | 19.68% | 19.68% | 35.44% | $72.1M |
Mackenzie Master LP vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MKZ.UN.TO or AAB.TO?
Aberdeen International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Master LP's net margin of -48.1%. Mackenzie Master LP's return on equity of 153.35% beat Aberdeen International, Inc.'s return on equity of -319.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP-- -- $253.3K AAB.TOAberdeen International, Inc.-- $0.00 $1.1M -
What do Analysts Say About MKZ.UN.TO or AAB.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aberdeen International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Master LP has higher upside potential than Aberdeen International, Inc., analysts believe Mackenzie Master LP is more attractive than Aberdeen International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP0 0 0 AAB.TOAberdeen International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MKZ.UN.TO or AAB.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Master LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aberdeen International, Inc. has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.031%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKZ.UN.TO or AAB.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.95%. Aberdeen International, Inc. offers a yield of 96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie Master LP pays 100.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Aberdeen International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKZ.UN.TO or AAB.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aberdeen International, Inc. quarterly revenues of -$1.5M. Mackenzie Master LP's net income of -- is lower than Aberdeen International, Inc.'s net income of $738K. Notably, Mackenzie Master LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.70x while Aberdeen International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Master LP is 3.83x versus -- for Aberdeen International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP3.83x 6.70x -- -- AAB.TOAberdeen International, Inc.-- -- -$1.5M $738K
-
Which has Higher Returns MKZ.UN.TO or CVG.TO?
Clairvest Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Master LP's net margin of -615.58%. Mackenzie Master LP's return on equity of 153.35% beat Clairvest Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP-- -- $253.3K CVG.TOClairvest Group, Inc.-- $7.65 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About MKZ.UN.TO or CVG.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clairvest Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Master LP has higher upside potential than Clairvest Group, Inc., analysts believe Mackenzie Master LP is more attractive than Clairvest Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP0 0 0 CVG.TOClairvest Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MKZ.UN.TO or CVG.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Master LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clairvest Group, Inc. has a beta of -0.338, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.833%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKZ.UN.TO or CVG.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.95%. Clairvest Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Mackenzie Master LP pays 100.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Clairvest Group, Inc. pays out 1.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Clairvest Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Mackenzie Master LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKZ.UN.TO or CVG.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clairvest Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $36.7M. Mackenzie Master LP's net income of -- is lower than Clairvest Group, Inc.'s net income of $105.1M. Notably, Mackenzie Master LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.70x while Clairvest Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Master LP is 3.83x versus 11.03x for Clairvest Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP3.83x 6.70x -- -- CVG.TOClairvest Group, Inc.11.03x 14.27x $36.7M $105.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKZ.UN.TO or FNQ.CX?
Fineqia International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Master LP's net margin of -340.38%. Mackenzie Master LP's return on equity of 153.35% beat Fineqia International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP-- -- $253.3K FNQ.CXFineqia International, Inc.97.84% -$0.00 -$1.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MKZ.UN.TO or FNQ.CX?
Mackenzie Master LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fineqia International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Master LP has higher upside potential than Fineqia International, Inc., analysts believe Mackenzie Master LP is more attractive than Fineqia International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP0 0 0 FNQ.CXFineqia International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MKZ.UN.TO or FNQ.CX More Risky?
Mackenzie Master LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fineqia International, Inc. has a beta of 1.819, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.879%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKZ.UN.TO or FNQ.CX?
Mackenzie Master LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.95%. Fineqia International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie Master LP pays 100.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Fineqia International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKZ.UN.TO or FNQ.CX?
Mackenzie Master LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fineqia International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $148.1K. Mackenzie Master LP's net income of -- is lower than Fineqia International, Inc.'s net income of -$504.1K. Notably, Mackenzie Master LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.70x while Fineqia International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Master LP is 3.83x versus 8.01x for Fineqia International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP3.83x 6.70x -- -- FNQ.CXFineqia International, Inc.8.01x -- $148.1K -$504.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns MKZ.UN.TO or IGM.TO?
IGM Financial, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Master LP's net margin of 33.35%. Mackenzie Master LP's return on equity of 153.35% beat IGM Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP-- -- $253.3K IGM.TOIGM Financial, Inc.60.3% $1.36 $16.4B -
What do Analysts Say About MKZ.UN.TO or IGM.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IGM Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $69.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.01%. Given that IGM Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Master LP, analysts believe IGM Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Mackenzie Master LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP0 0 0 IGM.TOIGM Financial, Inc.1 6 0 -
Is MKZ.UN.TO or IGM.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Master LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IGM Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.812%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKZ.UN.TO or IGM.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.95%. IGM Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Mackenzie Master LP pays 100.14% of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial, Inc. pays out 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. IGM Financial, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Mackenzie Master LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKZ.UN.TO or IGM.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IGM Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $973.2M. Mackenzie Master LP's net income of -- is lower than IGM Financial, Inc.'s net income of $324.5M. Notably, Mackenzie Master LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.70x while IGM Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Master LP is 3.83x versus 4.44x for IGM Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP3.83x 6.70x -- -- IGM.TOIGM Financial, Inc.4.44x 14.43x $973.2M $324.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKZ.UN.TO or SII.TO?
Sprott, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Master LP's net margin of 25.49%. Mackenzie Master LP's return on equity of 153.35% beat Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP-- -- $253.3K SII.TOSprott, Inc.94.33% $1.55 $503.4M -
What do Analysts Say About MKZ.UN.TO or SII.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $196.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.21%. Given that Sprott, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mackenzie Master LP, analysts believe Sprott, Inc. is more attractive than Mackenzie Master LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP0 0 0 SII.TOSprott, Inc.3 1 0 -
Is MKZ.UN.TO or SII.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Master LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.885%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKZ.UN.TO or SII.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.95%. Sprott, Inc. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Mackenzie Master LP pays 100.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc. pays out 53.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Mackenzie Master LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKZ.UN.TO or SII.TO?
Mackenzie Master LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues of $157.2M. Mackenzie Master LP's net income of -- is lower than Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $40.1M. Notably, Mackenzie Master LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.70x while Sprott, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Master LP is 3.83x versus 11.98x for Sprott, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKZ.UN.TOMackenzie Master LP3.83x 6.70x -- -- SII.TOSprott, Inc.11.98x 51.51x $157.2M $40.1M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
