Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Buy
68
MIVG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$39.68
Seasonality move
:
1.3%
Day range:
$39.68 - $39.68
52-week range:
$33.51 - $39.98
Dividend yield:
0.49%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
400
Avg. volume:
908
1-year change:
8.01%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
$39.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.49% | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
$46.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.7% | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
$37.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 1.76% | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
$18.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 7.21% | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
$50.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.01% | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.678 | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | 0.943 | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
-- | 0.521 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.868 | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRFG.TO
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or DISC.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or DRFG.TO?
Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or DRFG.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or DRFG.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF has a beta of 0.758, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.17%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or DRFG.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or DRFG.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Desjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- DRFG.TODesjardins RI Global Multifactor - FFR Free ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or GDPY.TO?
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- GDPY.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or GDPY.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 GDPY.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or GDPY.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.942%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or GDPY.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF offers a yield of 7.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or GDPY.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- GDPY.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Hedged ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.101%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or QEF.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.268% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
