Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
40
MIVG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$37.19
Seasonality move
:
1.3%
Day range:
$37.19 - $37.20
52-week range:
$33.51 - $40.38
Dividend yield:
0.69%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
3.4K
Avg. volume:
1K
1-year change:
0.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.B.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
$37.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 0.69% | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
$42.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.67% | -- |
|
GDPY.B.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF
|
$17.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 7.9% | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
$51.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 1.62% | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
$40.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.84 | 2.07% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.799 | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.785 | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.B.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF
|
-- | 0.724 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.591 | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.662 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DISC.TO
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDPY.B.TO
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QEF.NO
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or DISC.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.155% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.716%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or DISC.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for BMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- DISC.TOBMO Glo Consumer Discretionary Hdgd to CAD Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or GDPY.B.TO?
Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- GDPY.B.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or GDPY.B.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 GDPY.B.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or GDPY.B.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.155% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF has a beta of 0.549, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.105%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or GDPY.B.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF offers a yield of 7.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or GDPY.B.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Guardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- GDPY.B.TOGuardian Directed Premium Yield Port Unhedged ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.155% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.572%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or ONEQ.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQ.TOCI Global Core Plus Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or QEF.NO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.155% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or QEF.NO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for AGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- QEF.NOAGFiQ Global ESG Factors ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MIVG.TO or VVO.TO?
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net margin of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MIVG.TO or VVO.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF, analysts believe Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF0 0 0 VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF0 0 0 -
Is MIVG.TO or VVO.TO More Risky?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a beta of 0.638, which suggesting that the stock is 36.155% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.249%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MIVG.TO or VVO.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MIVG.TO or VVO.TO?
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF quarterly revenues of --. Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's net income of --. Notably, Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MIVG.TOMackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF-- -- -- -- VVO.TOVanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
